12 May
2007
12 May
'07
2:20 a.m.
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 17:56 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:13:17PM +0200, Florian
Schmidt wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2007, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> Since there is a way to add all this functionality as extension, the question
> is:
>
> Why would you _not_ want these as extensions, but as part of the core api?
>
[snip]
A second reason would be that using different init()
and run() functions
For at least the third time.. additional init() functions does not make
sense. The existing init function already has an arbitrarily extensible
parameter mechanism.
-DR-