1 Mar
2007
1 Mar
'07
2:45 p.m.
On 3/1/07, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric(a)zhevny.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus
wrote:
This solution is far too obvious. My brain simply refuses to consider this.
;-)
More seriously, I also thought of those. But lad(a)linuxaudio.org may
raise the same problems as user(a)linuxaudio.org (at least for
dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
doubt it does).
Thought I admit that the most obvious alias for these lists would be
lad, lau and laa.
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Markinoko.
he might be right. a random bot is more likely to
spam
user(a)linuxaudio.org than linux-audio-user@...
a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
or user-ml@.. (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
or lad, lau, laa as many of us tend to refer to them colloquially.