30 Mar
2006
30 Mar
'06
5:52 a.m.
Erik de Castro Lopo:
Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Yeah, I remember you wrote something like that once. But you should write
it into the documentation as well, and include a note that it is not
implemented efficiently.
Actually, the best is probably if you just remove the linear resampler
all together if you are not willing to implement it properly. It is
very irritating spending lots of time figuring out why things are so slow.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your work very much, but this
particular issue is irritating. There are situations where linear
resampling is useful, for example when resampling xx sounds at once.
Was this with the linear resampler lib
libsamplerate? In case, you should
know that its terrible slow. Last time I tried, the fastest sinc resampler
in CLM was almost as fast as the linear resampler in libsamplerate.
(Erik, you should do something about that...)
Maybe I haven't made myself clear. IMHO linear resampling sucks
for audio. It is included in libsamplerate purely so I can
show how bad it actually is.