Thank you, I will try to bite the source code ;-)
I want to say that I was trying NSM yesterday and I'm very impressed by
it's simplicity and (a no minor point) it's desing from the graphical point
of view.
I want to say that I'm very impressed by the thoroughness of the documentation,
something that I always admire.
From the **USER** point of view I had tried Jack
Session and LASH (a long
time ago when it was a requirement with FST) and by now NSM
(a bit hasty
decision) is in the 1st place.
Maybe now it's the time that people involved in LAD (I'm just a user with a
little code experience, but I can help in any way) just try to
document the advantages
and disadvantages about Jack-session, LASH, LADISH, Scripts, NSM in
http://jackaudio.org/persistent_connections, or maybe in the Jack Wiki just
like the Jack1 and Jack2 comparison document that was included some time
ago.
I think that it could help devs and users as well to get a picture of the
current Session Managment world in JACK.
Thanks for this great peace of software.
Diego
2012/3/26 Emanuel Rumpf <xbran(a)web.de>
Am 26. März 2012 22:17 schrieb Diego Simak
<diego.simak(a)gmail.com>om>:
is there any document where to read more about NSM other than
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/ ?
There is
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html
In the source package, there is some documentation too !
Finally there is always the source code :)
Thanks for your help.
Diego
Thanks for interest.
--
E.R.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev