6 Mar
2004
6 Mar
'04
2:04 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:45:03 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Steve Harris]
It doesnt look like it to me ;)
If you look back through the archives you'l
see that my attitude changed
form "yay, more features, cram them in" (luckily rained in by Paul and
Richard) to a more considered attitude.
and now we all have a solid 4 years of hands-on ladspa experience
showing what the standard lacks sorely.
we all agree, it seems, on what this is, so the danger of cramming in
features without consideration is reduced to the point of nothingness
i think. having those extended features in a header or in RDF
is an
insignificant distinction:
if we do it, we must support it in the future no matter whether it is
written in .h or .rdf.
Yes, but the difference to new developers is huge, they must understand
everything in the .h file before thay can write a plugin or host.
- Steve