10 May
2008
10 May
'08
8:12 p.m.
Is there any good reason why the B-format port groups refer
to the 2nd order horizontal components as R and S ?
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.
13 May
13 May
12:17 p.m.
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:04 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Is there any good reason why the B-format port groups
refer
to the 2nd order horizontal components as R and S ?
Good question. I got the component names from an article that I can't
find now, but according to Wikipedia they are not the normal ones. It is
of course possible that I made a typo, but I'm pretty sure I got the
names right from that article (and since I can't find it no one will
ever prove me wrong!).
I am not aware of any host or plugin that is using the port semantics of
the Ambisonic B port groups yet, so it should be safe to fix that bug.
Are the component names in this table correct?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambisonic#Possible_combinations
--ll
1:06 p.m.
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Lars Luthman wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:04 +0200, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
They look OK. One other point: I wouldn't name the groups by the
number of channels, but use something indicating the order(s), e.g.
****-h2v1 or ****-2,1 for second order horizontal, first order vertical.
Ciao,
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.
Is there any good reason why the B-format port
groups refer
to the 2nd order horizontal components as R and S ?
Good question. I got the component names from an article that I can't
find now, but according to Wikipedia they are not the normal ones. It is
of course possible that I made a typo, but I'm pretty sure I got the
names right from that article (and since I can't find it no one will
ever prove me wrong!).
I am not aware of any host or plugin that is using the port semantics of
the Ambisonic B port groups yet, so it should be safe to fix that bug.
Are the component names in this table correct?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambisonic#Possible_combinations
1:36 p.m.
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:58 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Lars Luthman
wrote:
OK, I've updated the webpage.
--ll
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:04 +0200, Fons
Adriaensen wrote:
They look OK. One other point: I wouldn't name the groups by the
number of channels, but use something indicating the order(s), e.g.
****-h2v1 or ****-2,1 for second order horizontal, first order vertical. Is there any good reason why the B-format port
groups refer
to the 2nd order horizontal components as R and S ?
Good question. I got the component names from an article that I can't
find now, but according to Wikipedia they are not the normal ones. It is
of course possible that I made a typo, but I'm pretty sure I got the
names right from that article (and since I can't find it no one will
ever prove me wrong!).
I am not aware of any host or plugin that is using the port semantics of
the Ambisonic B port groups yet, so it should be safe to fix that bug.
Are the component names in this table correct?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambisonic#Possible_combinations
6033
days inactive
6036
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Fons Adriaensen -
Lars Luthman