5 Jul
2006
5 Jul
'06
12:27 p.m.
So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs libgnomecanvasmm,
which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found it here:
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnome…
And when I try to build it, I get this:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnomecanvasmm\" -I../../libgnomecanvas
-I../../libgnomecanvas -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API
-I/usr/local/include/libart-2.0
-I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4
-I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/gdkmm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4 -I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -g -O2 -MT line.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/line.Tpo -c line.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/line.o
In file included from line.cc:3:
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:374: error: extra qualification ignored
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:375: error: explicit specialization of
non-template
`Glib::<anonymous class>'
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:375: error: an anonymous union cannot have
function
members
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:378: error: abstract declarator
`Glib::<anonymous
class>' used as declaration
make[4]: *** [line.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/scameron/software/libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.0/libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/scameron/software/libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.0/libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/scameron/software/libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.0/libgnomecanvas'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/scameron/software/libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.0/libgnomecanvas'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
[scameron@zuul libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.0]$
Anybody know how to get around this...? (without installing another OS
preferably)
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
5 Jul
5 Jul
12:42 p.m.
--- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs libgnomecanvasmm,
which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found it here:
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnome…
And when I try to build it, I get this:
[...]
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:374:
error: extra qualification ignored
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:375: error: explicit specialization of
non-template
`Glib::<anonymous class>'
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:375: error: an anonymous union cannot have
function
members
../../libgnomecanvas/libgnomecanvasmm/line.h:378: error: abstract declarator
`Glib::<anonymous
[...]
Oh, yeah, I found this:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141545
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2004-May/msg00007.html
Which says:
ibgnomecanvasmm/libgnomecanvasmm/property.{h,cc}:
GNOMEMM_PROPERTY macro is failed to compile when T is a template class.
#define GNOMEMM_PROPERTY(N,N2,T) \
class N : public Property<T> \
{ \
public: \
N(const T& v); \
};
It is fixed by replacing 'Property<T>' by 'Property<T >'.
------------
But, making that change did not help for me.
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
1:19 p.m.
--- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs libgnomecanvasmm,
> which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found it here:
>
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnome…
Nevermind, I found binary RPMs that seem to work.
Sorry about making this noise on the list.
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
9:06 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hearing some noise about anyone trying to use smack/om is a good thing
;) I am sorry about the some what limited smack docs.... If you have
any probs feel free to ask. If you find any solutions feel free to put
them on the smack or om wiki ;)
Loki
--- Stephen
Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
libgnomecanvasmm,
> which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem
to have, so I found it here:
>
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnome…
Nevermind, I found binary RPMs that seem to work.
Sorry about making this noise on the list.
-- steve
6 Jul
6 Jul
1:41 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
--- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Hearing some noise about anyone trying to use smack/om is a good thing
Yeah, I know what you mean. Sourceforge reports over 1000 downloads of
my gneutronica, but I have about 2 people I know of who I know have actually
attempted to use it. I find myself wondering if the other 998 are just
robots that download whatever appears on sourceforge. I have gotten zero
contributions in terms of code or even bug reports... on the bright side,
I've had to deal with zero bug reports, or patches that don't work or are
otherwise insane, LOL.
Well, I can hardly complain about lack of code contributions. Before
I started this, I looked instead to try to make Hydrogen do what I wanted,
but there was so much code, and it was so incomprehensible and foreign
to me, it was easier to just write my own, and, doing that allowed me to
learn as I went, at my own pace, so it has been satisfying, even if I am
the only real user of my program.
---
Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
libgnomecanvasmm,
> which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem
to have, so I found it here:
>
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnome…
Nevermind, I found binary RPMs that seem to work.
Sorry about making this noise on the list.
-- steve
;) I am sorry about the some what limited smack
docs.... If you have
any probs feel free to ask. If you find any solutions feel free to put
them on the smack or om wiki ;)
Actually, the binary rpms I found didn't work out after all.
They allowed me to build everything, but...
I tried to start om_gtk... First it complained about not being able to find
libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in /usr/lib)
ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
Now, it complains...
[scameron@zuul ~]$ om_gtk
[StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for class
`gtkmm__GtkWindow'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `width_chars' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `single_line_mode' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget(): dynamic_cast<>
failed.
So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
Ah, well, it's all part of this great, very intellectual
video game I've been playing for the last year called
"Linux Audio Adventure."
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
5:34 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen Cameron wrote:
--- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're
using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot
complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a
stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the
ball... :) )
The configure script should have stopped you from building it though,
odd. What version of gtkmm?
-DR-
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron
<smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hearing some noise about anyone trying to use smack/om is a good thing
Yeah, I know what you mean. Sourceforge reports over 1000 downloads of
my gneutronica, but I have about 2 people I know of who I know have actually
attempted to use it. I find myself wondering if the other 998 are just
robots that download whatever appears on sourceforge. I have gotten zero
contributions in terms of code or even bug reports... on the bright side,
I've had to deal with zero bug reports, or patches that don't work or are
otherwise insane, LOL.
Well, I can hardly complain about lack of code contributions. Before
I started this, I looked instead to try to make Hydrogen do what I wanted,
but there was so much code, and it was so incomprehensible and foreign
to me, it was easier to just write my own, and, doing that allowed me to
learn as I went, at my own pace, so it has been satisfying, even if I am
the only real user of my program.
---
Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
libgnomecanvasmm,
> which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem
to have, so I found it here:
>
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnome…
Nevermind, I found binary RPMs that seem to work.
Sorry about making this noise on the list.
-- steve
;) I am sorry about the some what limited smack
docs.... If you have
any probs feel free to ask. If you find any solutions feel free to put
them on the smack or om wiki ;)
Actually, the binary rpms I found didn't work out after all.
They allowed me to build everything, but...
I tried to start om_gtk... First it complained about not being able to find
libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in /usr/lib)
ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
Now, it complains...
[scameron@zuul ~]$ om_gtk
[StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for class
`gtkmm__GtkWindow'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `width_chars' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `single_line_mode' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget(): dynamic_cast<>
failed.
So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
10:24 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
--- Dave Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca> wrote:
[scameron@zuul software]$ rpm -qa | grep gtkmm
gtkmm24-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-devel-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-docs-2.4.11-1
And just to check in case I built it from source without telling RPM...
[scameron@zuul software]$ ls -ld /usr/lib/libgtkmm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4127910 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2517840 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
[scameron@zuul software]$
Hmm, looking at gtk.org, I see gtk and friends churn quite a lot.
I foresee hours and hours of downloading in my future.
Should I grab gtk 2.8 + dependencies?
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen Cameron
wrote:
>
> --- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > --- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
> > > libgnomecanvasmm,
> > > > > which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found
it here:
[...]
I tried to
start om_gtk... First it complained about not being able to find
libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in /usr/lib)
ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
Now, it complains...
[scameron@zuul ~]$ om_gtk
[StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for class
`gtkmm__GtkWindow'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `ellipsize' for class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `width_chars' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `single_line_mode' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
(om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget(): dynamic_cast<>
failed.
So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're
using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot
complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a
stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the
ball... :) )
The configure script should have stopped you from building it though,
odd. What version of gtkmm?
-DR-
8:57 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Dave Robillard
<drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca> wrote:
[scameron@zuul software]$ rpm -qa | grep gtkmm
gtkmm24-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-devel-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-docs-2.4.11-1
And just to check in case I built it from source without telling RPM...
[scameron@zuul software]$ ls -ld /usr/lib/libgtkmm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4127910 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2517840 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
[scameron@zuul software]$
Hmm, looking at gtk.org, I see gtk and friends churn quite a lot.
I foresee hours and hours of downloading in my future.
Should I grab gtk 2.8 + dependencies?
-- steve
It doesn't take that long to build it all from source, it might be
easier to do some kind of upgrade/update/distupdate of your distro
instead. Can you just change where your apt-get/whatever sources are
pointed at and then upgrade easily. I've done this many times over
many years with mandriva and never had a problem.
Loki
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen
Cameron wrote:
>
> --- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > --- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
> > > libgnomecanvasmm,
> > > > > which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found
it
here:
[...]
> I tried to start om_gtk... First it
complained about not being able to
find
> libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in
/usr/lib)
>
> ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
>
> Now, it complains...
>
> [scameron@zuul ~]$ om_gtk
> [StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for
class
`gtkmm__GtkWindow'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `width_chars' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `single_line_mode'
for class
> `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
>
> And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
>
> ** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget():
dynamic_cast<> failed.
So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're
using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot
complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a
stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the
ball... :) )
The configure script should have stopped you from building it though,
odd. What version of gtkmm?
-DR-
7 Jul
7 Jul
1:20 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
--- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Actually, I already built it from source this morning, but, still no go...
All these from gtk.org:
* Installed cairo-1.2.0
* Installed glib-2.6.6 ... it went into /usr/local/lib
* set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PKG_CONFIG_PATH to include /usr/local/lib...
* Installed atk-1.9.0
* Installed pango-1.8.2
* Installed gtk-2.6.10
Reconfigured om... noticed it complained about lash not being found...
* Installed lash-0.5.1 from http://www.nongnu.org/lash/
Reconfigured om-, and recompiled and installed.
Still complains about the glade stuff as before.
I didn't rebuild libgnomecanvasmm though, because there
seems to be some compiler problem, it seems.
Maybe I have to upgrade gcc?
I have:
gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3)
Maybe I can't have those libs in /usr/local/lib, but must
have them in /usr/lib?
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Dave Robillard
<drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca> wrote:
[scameron@zuul software]$ rpm -qa | grep gtkmm
gtkmm24-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-devel-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-docs-2.4.11-1
And just to check in case I built it from source without telling RPM...
[scameron@zuul software]$ ls -ld /usr/lib/libgtkmm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4127910 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2517840 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
[scameron@zuul software]$
Hmm, looking at gtk.org, I see gtk and friends churn quite a lot.
I foresee hours and hours of downloading in my future.
Should I grab gtk 2.8 + dependencies?
-- steve
It doesn't take that long to build it all from source, it might be
easier to do some kind of upgrade/update/distupdate of your distro
instead. Can you just change where your apt-get/whatever sources are
pointed at and then upgrade easily. I've done this many times over
many years with mandriva and never had a problem.
Loki
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen
Cameron wrote:
>
> --- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > --- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
> > > libgnomecanvasmm,
> > > > > which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found
it
here:
[...]
> I tried to start om_gtk... First it
complained about not being able to
find
> libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in
/usr/lib)
>
> ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
>
> Now, it complains...
>
> [scameron@zuul ~]$ om_gtk
> [StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for
class
`gtkmm__GtkWindow'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `width_chars' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `single_line_mode'
for class
> `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
>
> And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
>
> ** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget():
dynamic_cast<> failed.
So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're
using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot
complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a
stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the
ball... :) )
The configure script should have stopped you from building it though,
odd. What version of gtkmm?
-DR-
2:36 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
All these from gtk.org:
* Installed cairo-1.2.0
* Installed glib-2.6.6 ... it went into /usr/local/lib
* set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PKG_CONFIG_PATH to include /usr/local/lib...
* Installed atk-1.9.0
* Installed pango-1.8.2
* Installed gtk-2.6.10
Reconfigured om... noticed it complained about lash not being found...
* Installed lash-0.5.1 from http://www.nongnu.org/lash/
Reconfigured om-, and recompiled and installed.
Still complains about the glade stuff as before.
I didn't rebuild libgnomecanvasmm though, because there
seems to be some compiler problem, it seems.
from om-cvs ebuild:
DEPEND=">=media-libs/liblo-0.22
=media-sound/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99
=dev-libs/libxml2-2.6
media-libs/dssi
media-libs/ladspa-sdk
media-plugins/omins
=dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.4
=dev-cpp/libgnomecanvasmm-2.6
=dev-cpp/libglademm-2.4.1
=media-libs/flowcanvas-0.1.0
lash? ( media-sound/lash )
dssi? ( media-libs/dssi )
!media-sound/om"
as other users suggested, i'd update your distro to the current version. if it still
doesnt have the above dependencies , id switch to a distro that does. debian and gentoo
are two good options... probably arch and mandrake as well..
2:44 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 20:20 -0700, Stephen Cameron wrote:
--- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Om uses Gtkmm. It's only direct dependency related to all that stuff is
Gtkmm (and libglademm). Upgrade those :)
-DR-
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron
<smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Actually, I already built it from source this morning, but, still no go...
All these from gtk.org:
* Installed cairo-1.2.0
* Installed glib-2.6.6 ... it went into /usr/local/lib
* set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PKG_CONFIG_PATH to include /usr/local/lib...
* Installed atk-1.9.0
* Installed pango-1.8.2
* Installed gtk-2.6.10 --- Dave Robillard
<drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca> wrote:
It doesn't take that long to build it all from source, it might be
easier to do some kind of upgrade/update/distupdate of your distro
instead. Can you just change where your apt-get/whatever sources are
pointed at and then upgrade easily. I've done this many times over
many years with mandriva and never had a problem.
Loki
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen
Cameron wrote:
>
> --- Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > --- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
> > > libgnomecanvasmm,
> > > > > which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found
it
here:
[...]
> I tried to start om_gtk... First it
complained about not being able to
find
> libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in
/usr/lib)
>
> ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
>
> Now, it complains...
>
> [scameron@zuul ~]$ om_gtk
> [StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for
class
`gtkmm__GtkWindow'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `width_chars' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `single_line_mode'
for class
> `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown
property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
>
> And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
>
> ** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget():
dynamic_cast<> failed.
>
> So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
> or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're
using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot
complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a
stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the
ball... :) )
The configure script should have stopped you from building it though,
odd. What version of gtkmm?
-DR-
[scameron@zuul software]$ rpm -qa | grep gtkmm
gtkmm24-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-devel-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-docs-2.4.11-1
And just to check in case I built it from source without telling RPM...
[scameron@zuul software]$ ls -ld /usr/lib/libgtkmm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4127910 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2517840 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
[scameron@zuul software]$
Hmm, looking at gtk.org, I see gtk and friends churn quite a lot.
I foresee hours and hours of downloading in my future.
Should I grab gtk 2.8 + dependencies?
-- steve
6 Jul
6 Jul
1:55 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
I wrote:
I have gotten zero contributions in terms of code or
even bug reports... [ for gneutronica ]
On second thought, this is not quite true, and not wishing to
slight anyone, I thought I had better correct myself. Someone
diligently produces RPMs from my source releases for several
distros of their own volition (thanks oc2pus) and a couple
people noticed my last release had a broken tar.gz file
right away.
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
3:16 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Trying to build Om,
On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I wrote:
The oc2pus guys do the same for smack! ;) and phat and khagan! I've
also had thorsten contributing lots of stuff but not anyone i didn't
know from irc.
I have gotten zero contributions in terms of code
or
even bug reports... [ for gneutronica ]
On second thought, this is not quite true, and not wishing to
slight anyone, I thought I had better correct myself. Someone
diligently produces RPMs from my source releases for several
distros of their own volition (thanks oc2pus) and a couple
people noticed my last release had a broken tar.gz file
right away.
-- steve
7055
days inactive
7057
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
12 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
carmen -
Dave Robillard -
Loki Davison -
Stephen Cameron