14 Jan
2003
14 Jan
'03
11:07 p.m.
i'd like to remind the folks involved in the XAP discussion that it
would be really, really, really useful to get some summary
documentation on where the design process stands and what has been
accomplished thus far. if you can provide this, i will need it by 3pm
EST on thursday at the absolute latest.
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please critique this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
--p
15 Jan
15 Jan
12:38 a.m.
Paul Davis wrote:
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please
critique this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
Woohoo ! Looks sweet from here, Paul...
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
The Book Of Linux Music & Sound at http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm
The Linux Soundapps Site at http://linux-sound.org
Currently listening to: the sounds of silence...
12:47 a.m.
i'd like to remind the folks involved in the XAP
discussion that it
would be really, really, really useful to get some summary
documentation on where the design process stands and what has been
accomplished thus far. if you can provide this, i will need it by 3pm
EST on thursday at the absolute latest.
I was working on this today, will have something to you..
12:54 a.m.
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 05.40, Tim Hockin wrote:
Great! Anything for public review soon?
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
i'd like
to remind the folks involved in the XAP discussion that
it would be really, really, really useful to get some summary
documentation on where the design process stands and what has
been accomplished thus far. if you can provide this, i will need
it by 3pm EST on thursday at the absolute latest.
I was working on this today, will have something to you..
12:52 a.m.
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 04.01, Paul Davis wrote:
i'd like to remind the folks involved in the XAP
discussion that it
would be really, really, really useful to get some summary
documentation on where the design process stands and what has been
accomplished thus far. if you can provide this, i will need it by
3pm EST on thursday at the absolute latest.
Ouch. Well, unless someone's been busy, we'll need to write something
virtually from scratch.
Either way, how much detail would be needed? I suppose one should at
least mention the timestamped events, control ramping, the decoupling
of note ID from note pitch and that kind of stuff, but at this point,
I don't think we have enough stuff finalized, or enough time to write
about the details.
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please
critique
this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
I think the list of highlight would look cleaner with bullets and
left justified text, and I'm not sure about the horizontal separator
bar crossing the vertical one on the first page.
Other than that, it looks great!
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
4:31 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:01:44PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please
critique this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
Read it and the only thing I could come up with,
was an extra hyphen, which is undecided in English anyway :)
[twenty first -> twenty-first]
Also a minor nit:
The text under the screenshot on the first page
seems somewhat oddly aligned ?
But for the rest, perfect,
v
6:11 a.m.
Hi,
Paul Davis hat gesagt: // Paul Davis wrote:
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please
critique this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
"A binary release of Ardour will be available within the next month or
two, and most major Linux distributions will likely include it."
Is it that time of the year(s) already? I really should checkout
Ardour again, which I had not been following compilationwise for
months.
Regarding the PDF: What would you think about adding "VST (x86) plugin
support via external software" to the list of Editing features? I
didn't test this obviously, but it's a cool buzzword.
ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
7:16 a.m.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 03:01 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please
critique this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
It's nice but who is it aimed at? If it's for general audio folks
I would suggest having more features of the app etc on page 1 and
more about the Linux environment on page 2. And maybe a little
info about hardware requirements?
Cheers
John
--
http://Mstation.org
7920
days inactive
7921
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
7 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Dave Phillips -
David Olofson -
Frank Barknecht -
John Littler -
Paul Davis -
Tim Hockin -
Vincent Touquet