24 Oct
2008
24 Oct
'08
9:05 p.m.
Hi List, I had one more question,
if you'd bear with me...this is a different question from the last one.
I play an instrument called the jaw harp, which is played in this video(not
me!):
http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=rDdG97MesZM
Now I would like to feed this live audio into my box, do a bit of morphing
on the sound and have that play in real-time output. It might even trigger
some other
sample from a C/C++ program. I don't want to use one of the audio
programming
languages like pd, Chuck, SC, Csound etc. I want to build my own system
using
linux audio native capabilities. .
In your general opinion with C/C++ as the language, what other configuration
would
be suitable? As in I/O device (OSS/Jack/Alsa/PortAudio/) and which audio
library.....
-- sincerely,
------- -.-
1/f ))) --.
------- ...
http://www.algomantra.com
24 Oct
24 Oct
9:25 p.m.
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 04:35 +0530, AlgoMantra wrote:
Hi List, I had one more question,
if you'd bear with me...this is a different question from the last
one.
I play an instrument called the jaw harp, which is played in this
video(not me!):
http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=rDdG97MesZM
Now I would like to feed this live audio into my box, do a bit of
morphing
on the sound and have that play in real-time output. It might even
trigger some other
sample from a C/C++ program. I don't want to use one of the audio
programming
languages like pd, Chuck, SC, Csound etc. I want to build my own
system using
linux audio native capabilities.
You are urged to revisit this assumption. Every single one of those
systems started from a similar premise as you are now claiming.
Of course, if you just want to waste time programming instead of making
cool sounds etc, go right ahead. Otherwise you will be at least 10x as
productive using pd as you will in C++.
9:52 p.m.
You are urged to revisit this assumption. Every single
one of those
systems started from a similar premise as you are now claiming.
Of course, if you just want to waste time programming
instead of making
cool sounds etc, go right ahead. Otherwise you will be at least 10x as
productive using pd as you will in C++.
Paul,
Perhaps you were thrown off by my statement that "I want to build my own
system using linux audio native capabilities". And I sincerely apologise for
that!
I don't want to (or think I "can") build another pd/ChucK. I simply
don't
have that
kind of intention.I assure you that the system I have in mind is not an
audio
programming language, although linux audio is an integral part of it.
------- -.-
1/f ))) --.
------- ...
http://www.algomantra.com
5871
days inactive
5871
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
AlgoMantra -
Paul Davis