Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues - Linux-audio-dev

25 May 2005

I think that would be a non-standard extension of the current practice and wouldn't be
understood by current parsers.

Taybin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jens M Andreasen &lt;jens.andreasen(a)chello.se&gt;
Sent: May 25, 2005 3:16 AM
To: 
	The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List &lt;linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu&gt;
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:03 +0100, Nick Dowell wrote:
...
  Good idea.

 reverse - domain name type addresses are used quite widely now, in Java 
 for example and in all apple's latest stuff.

 eg "uk.org.plugin.analogueOsc"

Can we have a unique divider between the domain and product?

   foo.bar(a)example.com
and
   foo(a)bar.example.com

.. are in java both represented as

   com.example.bar.foo

Having instead, say

   com.example(a)bar.foo
and
   com.example.bar@foo

.. would resolve this (minor) issue.

...
  combined with a version number, you can correctly
identify plugins no 
 matter their filename..

 -n

 On 20 May 2005, at 14:19, Steve Harris wrote:

  Or, we could use a system thats been demonstrated
to work really 
 well...
 http://www.w3.org/Addressing/ 
  -- 