22 Jan
2007
22 Jan
'07
5:54 p.m.
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
This test gives me yet more incentive to continue my work on coming
up with a new improved algorithm.
Cheers,
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"I'd rather not work with people who aren't careful. It's darwinism
in software development." -- Linus Torvalds on the linux-kernel list
22 Jan
22 Jan
6:07 p.m.
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 08:53 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
congrats Erik. as you said, not the best (r8brain ?) but compared to the
stuff in some proprietary DAWs, pretty great. quite amazing how bad the
ProTools and Sadie systems were ...
--p
6:44 p.m.
Paul Davis wrote:
congrats Erik.
Thanks!
as you said, not the best (r8brain ?)
r8brains was good as was iZotope, Wavelab/Crystal and a couple of
others.
but compared to the
stuff in some proprietary DAWs, pretty great. quite amazing how bad the
ProTools and Sadie systems were ...
Protools wasn't *that* bad unless you look at it on a bang per buck
basis :-).
Sadie however was appallingly bad.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
I call C++ a curse on programmers everywhere; the language
that has enabled and encouraged more stupidity and bad software
design than any other programming language ever.
6:53 p.m.
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
I should also thank Ben Loftis of GWL (Harrison consoles)
for hooking me up with the people running the tests so that
the Rabbit could be included.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"A 'newbie', in Haskell, is someone who hasn't yet implemented a
compiler. They've only written a monad tutorial."
-- From #haskell on freenode
23 Jan
23 Jan
10:13 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on
the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on). The only
way I can look at the results is to get the URLs for individual images
from the page source and type them in manually.
John
10:45 a.m.
======= On Tuesday 23 January 2007 17:31, John Rigg wrote: =======
Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on
the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on). The only
way I can look at the results is to get the URLs for individual images
from the page source and type them in manually.
John
The same with FF 2.0.0.1.
10:53 a.m.
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:31 +0000, John Rigg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de
Castro Lopo wrote:
its just you :) or rather, an early version of firefox perhaps. i have
1.5.X and it works fine here.
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on
the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on). The only
way I can look at the results is to get the URLs for individual images
from the page source and type them in manually. 
11:12 a.m.
On 23 Jan 2007, at 14:43, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:31 +0000, John Rigg wrote:
Works fine with my 2.0.0.1 too.
- Steve
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de
Castro Lopo wrote:
its just you :) or rather, an early version of firefox perhaps. i have
1.5.X and it works fine here. Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on
the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on). The
only
way I can look at the results is to get the URLs for individual
images
from the page source and type them in manually. 
10:55 a.m.
tisdag 23 januari 2007 15:31 skrev John Rigg:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de
Castro Lopo wrote:
1.0.x is end of life in april 2006. You should upgrade to be on the safe side.
regards,
--
- Bengan ------------------------------------------------------------
- KTHNOC - No1 Internet Offspring | http://www.noc.kth.se/~bengan ---
- 08-7906586 (ej vidarekopplat), 070-6443325 ------------------------
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on
the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on).
1:04 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:31:45PM +0000, John Rigg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de
Castro Lopo wrote:
It worked much better after I remembered I'd disabled `Change images'
in Javascript advanced settings.
Good to see SRC stands up so well against the proprietary stuff.
Nice work. (I particularly liked the 180-degree phase shift in Sonar :-)).
John
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on
the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on). The only
way I can look at the results is to get the URLs for individual images
from the page source and type them in manually. 
1:34 p.m.
Hello Erik,
On Mon, January 22, 2007 22:53, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a
number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
I once tried to further improve your sinc code, using longer and better
filters optimized using the Dolph-Chebyshev window and a different balance
between bandwidth and stopband attenuation, of course at the expense of
performances. It turned out that I couldn't improve the results above a given
threshold because of a sort of (really low level) jitter in the timebase
calculation. With integer resampling factors, where the jitter dind't appear
because of the way the timebase is computed, the results where on pair with
CoolEdit/Audition, which is among the best in that test.
It was long time ago, so I don't remeber exactly what I did, but this
information might be useful in improving your code. Removing this timebase
calculation problem, if it can be removed at all of course, probably will make
your code close to perfection, making the final performace just a factor of
the quality of the filters used. Regarding this, you might think about an
option to load the filters from file... :)
Of course this is just academic, because I really doubt that the tiny
artifacts introduced by SRC are audible at all, even in its current
implementation. Just a matter of winning the race. :)
Bye,
--
Denis Sbragion
InfoTecna
Tel: +39 0362 805396, Fax: +39 0362 805404
URL: http://www.infotecna.it
2:49 p.m.
Hi
I need help!!
I have just installed 64studio on a SATA disk (Hitachi 250 gig)
I have windoze on the first disk (HDA) and Ubuntu 32bit on the Secondary
Master HDC (?)
I did have an ide 150 gig but SMART informed me it was bad this originally
had 64studio on it.
I have removed the 150 and got the sata 250 for 64studio.
After installing It asked to write the boot to the MBR I said yes.
Now I can't boot at all no grub nothing just a cursor blinking at me, black
screen.
Any ideas how I get my stuff back the ubuntu stuff I really need.
Cheers
Bob
4:22 p.m.
Denis Sbragion wrote:
Of course this is just academic, because I really
doubt that the tiny
artifacts introduced by SRC are audible at all, even in its current
implementation. Just a matter of winning the race. :)
The current algorithm (originally described by Julius O. Smith)
has its limitations. Thats why I have spent a considerable
amount of time trying to come up with something that has lower
computational requirements as well as better quality :-).
Cheers,
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of PostScript." -- Jamie Zawinski
24 Jan
24 Jan
4:44 a.m.
Hello Erik,
On Tue, January 23, 2007 21:22, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
The current algorithm (originally described by Julius
O. Smith)
has its limitations. Thats why I have spent a considerable
amount of time trying to come up with something that has lower
computational requirements as well as better quality :-).
and did you get it? Which kind of algorithm are you using now? Quite curios...
Bye,
P.S. The CoolEdit algorithm provides excellent performances but I think it
works only for rational resampling factors, isn't it? This makes those
performances much easier to achieve, I think.
--
Denis Sbragion
InfoTecna
Tel: +39 0362 805396, Fax: +39 0362 805404
URL: http://www.infotecna.it
5:20 a.m.
Denis Sbragion wrote:
and did you get it?
I'm not there yet, but I'm getting closer.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"We must not forget that Allah's rules have to be established in all
lands."
-- Imam Muzammil H. Siddiqi of the Islamic Society of North America
6:40 a.m.
On Wed, January 24, 2007 10:20, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I'm not there yet, but I'm getting closer.
Great. Looking forward...
Bye,
--
Denis Sbragion
InfoTecna
Tel: +39 0362 805396, Fax: +39 0362 805404
URL: http://www.infotecna.it
6542
days inactive
6543
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
16 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Andrew Gaydenko -
Bengt Gördén -
Dave Phillips -
Denis Sbragion -
Erik de Castro Lopo -
Frank Smith -
John Rigg -
Paul Davis -
Steve Harris