15 Oct
2011
15 Oct
'11
3:59 p.m.
Hi everyone,
I was wondering something about the Naspro LV2 Plugins: Are they
considered as a workaround until we get the DSSI and LADSPA plugins
ported to LV2, or more of a "definitive" solution?
The reason why I'm asking the question is that I'm currently porting
the AlsaModularSynth internal modules into LV2 plugins for Ingen.
And when I'm creating synthesizers in AMS, I'm often (if not always)
using the LADSPA MCP plugins created by Fons Adriaensen.
So would there be any point porting these MCP plugins to LV2 as well,
or would the general consensus be "what's the point, we have Naspro
for that".
Thanks in advance!
Aurélien
15 Oct
15 Oct
4:07 p.m.
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 14:59 +0100, Aurélien Leblond wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering something about the Naspro LV2 Plugins: Are they
considered as a workaround until we get the DSSI and LADSPA plugins
ported to LV2, or more of a "definitive" solution?
The reason why I'm asking the question is that I'm currently porting
the AlsaModularSynth internal modules into LV2 plugins for Ingen.
And when I'm creating synthesizers in AMS, I'm often (if not always)
using the LADSPA MCP plugins created by Fons Adriaensen.
So would there be any point porting these MCP plugins to LV2 as well,
or would the general consensus be "what's the point, we have Naspro
for that".
Naspro as a project has more applications than bridging LADSPA to LV2.
That said, porting LADSPA plugins to LV2 is definitely the way to go (I
am currently working on blop).
-dr
4:08 p.m.
Hi Aurélien,
here's the main NASPRO author. :-)
2011/10/15 Aurélien Leblond <blablack(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering something about the Naspro LV2 Plugins: Are they
considered as a workaround until we get the DSSI and LADSPA plugins
ported to LV2, or more of a "definitive" solution?
I don't know, from my point of view NASPRO bridges do no harm. Of
course, ports are better.
The reason why I'm asking the question is that
I'm currently porting
the AlsaModularSynth internal modules into LV2 plugins for Ingen.
And when I'm creating synthesizers in AMS, I'm often (if not always)
using the LADSPA MCP plugins created by Fons Adriaensen.
So would there be any point porting these MCP plugins to LV2 as well,
or would the general consensus be "what's the point, we have Naspro
for that".
I'd say, if you plan to add something substantial sooner or later,
it's good to have ports.
IIRC you are using CVPorts, no? That is already a good reason to have
LV2 versions.
Just my 2c.
Stefano
4784
days inactive
4784
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Aurélien Leblond -
David Robillard -
Stefano D'Angelo