3 May
2006
3 May
'06
9:22 p.m.
Steve,
I think you mean Word Clock.
you are probably
right.
IIRC it's not an open design. It's owned by
Alesis.
That may or may not be a problem depending on their licencing requirments.
Esben,
No need to be sorry :) If 192kHz is to high we can always slow it down. 96 or 48 would
allow more processing power to be used for other things.
James,
I want one too :)
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
4 May
4 May
1:39 a.m.
"" <spikethehobbitmage(a)excite.com> writes:
If 192kHz is to high we can always slow it down. 96 or
48 would
allow more processing power to be used for other things.
That's in not the concern. You see, it is mathematically not necessary
to sample at 192kHz. Only reason for doing 96kHz is because of the
sharp filters you would need at something like 48kHz.
--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
[sip|iax]: e e
jid:b0ef@ n n
2:14 p.m.
Esben Stien wrote:
Depends on what you are doing. When working on ultrasound it just makes
life easier (no need to do undersampling).
- Jussi
If 192kHz is
to high we can always slow it down. 96 or 48 would
allow more processing power to be used for other things.
That's in not the concern. You see, it is mathematically not necessary
to sample at 192kHz. Only reason for doing 96kHz is because of the
6774
days inactive
6775
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Esben Stien -
Jussi Laako -
spikethehobbitmageï¼ excite.com