17 May
2006
17 May
'06
4:35 p.m.
Hi all-
I tried fst-1.7 under the latest version of wine on my Slackware 10.1
system--no luck still.
I'm beginning to think that fst is not playing nice with glibc-2.3.4
Can someone who has used Kontakt under Linux share the output
of /lib/libc.so.6 here with me so I can compare?
Also, if glibc is indeed the problem, is there smething I can change in the
fst code that would make it work with my current version if I can show
debugging info--I prefer not to go through the headache of overhauling my
entire system if there's a uick fix in fst code instead.
Another question--barring that, if I do replace glibc, will I have to
recompile my kernel, wine, etc?
Best,
Aaron.
17 May
17 May
5:40 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] more questions on FST
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 13:35 -0500, Aaron Krister Johnson wrote:
Another question--barring that, if I do replace glibc,
will I have to
recompile my kernel, wine, etc?
You would have to recompile EVERYTHING. Replacing glibc is major
surgery.
It's best to just upgrade to a newer distro.
Lee
5:46 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] more questions on FST
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:40:44PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 13:35 -0500, Aaron Krister
Johnson wrote:
thats not true lee.
i switched glibcs around when debugging fst.
just make sure you have the old version around, and a boot cd so that you
can recover from failure.
also make sure you enable tls.
and have a 2.6.x kernel...
Another question--barring that, if I do replace
glibc, will I have to
recompile my kernel, wine, etc?
You would have to recompile EVERYTHING. Replacing glibc is major
surgery.
It's best to just upgrade to a newer distro.
Lee
--
torben Hohn
http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language
8:10 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] more questions on FST
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 21:43 +0200, torbenh(a)gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:40:44PM -0400, Lee Revell
wrote:
I guess it depends on the distro. There was a recent report of someone
trying to upgrade glibc and they ended up having to reinstall.
I would think with a source based distro you'd have to recompile quite a
bit, but I haven't used one myself.
Does FST definitely require NPTL?
Lee
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 13:35 -0500, Aaron Krister
Johnson wrote:
thats not true lee.
i switched glibcs around when debugging fst.
just make sure you have the old version around, and a boot cd so that you
can recover from failure.
also make sure you enable tls.
and have a 2.6.x kernel... Another question--barring that, if I do replace
glibc, will I have to
recompile my kernel, wine, etc?
You would have to recompile EVERYTHING. Replacing glibc is major
surgery. 
2:02 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] more questions on FST
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 17:59 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Es geschah am Thursday, 18. May 2006 00:10 als Lee
Revell schrieb:
put differently: WINE requires NPTL to function adequately with
multithreaded applications.
--p
Does FST definitely require NPTL?
That's a big fat YES!
19 May
19 May
3:39 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] more questions on FST
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 17:59 +0200, Christian
Schoenebeck wrote:
the segfault is coming from pthread_self()
(in a signal_handler context or something)
which does not work in that case... man it was 2004 when i debugged this...
so it need TLS (Thread local Storage) at least.
I dont think there are many builds of NPTL without TLS. so this is
tightly coupled.
Es geschah am Thursday, 18. May 2006 00:10 als
Lee Revell schrieb:
put differently: WINE requires NPTL to function adequately with
multithreaded applications. Does FST definitely require NPTL?
That's a big fat YES!
--p
--
torben Hohn
http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language
17 May
17 May
6:08 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] more questions on FST
Le Wed, 17 May 2006 15:40:44 -0400,
Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 13:35 -0500, Aaron Krister
Johnson wrote:
It is a complicated matter. The system must be consistent. For that,
you can have a program compiled against glib.xxx compiled against
glib.yyy. It should work but is not optimal. If you want to replace
glib.yyy by glib.xxx, it is a long process. You can look at
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml to get an idée. The advantage of doing that
is at it is no need to reinstall everithing from the scratch and will it will keep even
your preferences, but in case of problem, you can get a completly broken system.
Ciao,
Dominique
Another question--barring that, if I do replace
glibc, will I have to
recompile my kernel, wine, etc?
You would have to recompile EVERYTHING. Replacing glibc is major
surgery.
It's best to just upgrade to a newer distro.
Lee
6560
days inactive
6562
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Aaron Krister Johnson -
Christian Schoenebeck -
Dominique Michel -
Lee Revell -
Paul Davis -
torbenh＠gmx.de