13 Jul
2009
13 Jul
'09
7:31 p.m.
Hi all,
Just happened to use top with all threads displayed (H).
Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
more than 60 threads ?
System is Fedora 10.
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
8:21 p.m.
On Tuesday 2009-07-14 00:15, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:25 +0200, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just happened to use top with all threads displayed (H).
>
> Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
> more than 60 threads ?
Holy crap. Well, it (0.2.10/openSUSE 11.1) has 64 threads for me, which
seems to correspond to the maximum number of kernel ttys allocatable.
Did not the original author ever visit ##c and be told that throwing
threads at a problem is not always the right solution..pesp since we're
just talking about ttys.
8:45 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:15:37AM +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
su
killall console-kit-daemon
That's what I do unless I forget :-)
What I'd like to know is where this mongrel is started. It used to
be a service, and I disabled it when using F8, but it's no longer.
Don't tell me I have to compile my own kernel to get rid of it ...
Ciao,
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
8:49 p.m.
On Tuesday 2009-07-14 00:39, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:15:37AM +0200, Jens M
Andreasen wrote:
It's still a service, and pretty much mandatory these days
together with hal and policykit, and not having it enabled
means you don't get your ACL on /dev/snd/* and whatnot. Meh,
resmgr seemed to have been so much better :/
su
killall console-kit-daemon
That's what I do unless I forget :-)
What I'd like to know is where this mongrel is started. It used to
be a service, and I disabled it when using F8, but it's no longer.
Don't tell me I have to compile my own kernel to get rid of it ...
9:09 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:49:58AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
It's still a service,
It it ? What's the name ? I don't see it in
chkconfig --list.
and pretty much mandatory these days
together with hal and policykit, and not having it enabled
means you don't get your ACL on /dev/snd/* and whatnot.
I've run my system for three weeks without it, all OK.
resmgr seemed to have been so much better :/
For the audio devices I just add some udev rules,
giving them to the audio group.
Ciao,
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
10:28 p.m.
On Tuesday 2009-07-14 01:03, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:49:58AM +0200, Jan
Engelhardt wrote:
Hm now that you mention it.
It must have been spawned by hald because its PID is
immediatelly following.
101 2443 0.0 0.2 6492 2280 ? Ss Jul13 0:05 /usr/sbin/hald
root 2509 0.0 0.0 3532 1000 ? S Jul13 0:00 \_ hald-runner
root 2533 0.0 0.0 3652 868 ? S Jul13 0:06 \_ hald-ad
root 2554 0.0 0.0 3152 672 ? S Jul13 0:03 \_ hald-ad
root 2557 0.0 0.0 3656 904 ? S Jul13 0:12 \_ hald-ad
101 2559 0.0 0.0 3380 792 ? S Jul13 0:00 \_ hald-ad
root 2446 0.0 0.1 16944 1984 ? Ssl Jul13 0:00 /usr/sbin/conso
^
Killing ckd and doing rchal restart resurrects ckd for me.
It's still a service,
It it ? What's the name ? I don't see it in
chkconfig --list. 
8:18 p.m.
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:25:39 +0200
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Just happened to use top with all threads displayed (H).
Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
more than 60 threads ?
System is Fedora 10.
All I can tell you is that it does the same here, 63 if I didn't
misscount. This is not on Fedora but on Arch Linux.
8:49 p.m.
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 01:18:17 hollunder(a)gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:25:39 +0200
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
I haven't counted them, but I see practically the same thing at work where I
use Ubuntu 9.04.
Hi all,
Just happened to use top with all threads displayed (H).
Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
more than 60 threads ?
System is Fedora 10.
All I can tell you is that it does the same here, 63 if I didn't
misscount. This is not on Fedora but on Arch Linux. 
14 Jul
14 Jul
6:06 a.m.
Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
I haven't counted them, but I see practically the
same thing at work where I
use Ubuntu 9.04.
For Ubuntu Hardy (64 Studio 3.0-beta3) exact 62 from around 170 threads
are /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon at the moment on my system. Around 170
threads, because I have several applications for making a circuit layout
opened. 62 threads looks strange, but has it got really noticeable
disadvantages? Anyway, I just wanted to inform about the count of
console-kit threads on Ubuntu based systems.
13 Jul
13 Jul
9:06 p.m.
Den Monday 13 July 2009 23.25.39 skrev Fons Adriaensen:
Hi all,
Just happened to use top with all threads displayed (H).
Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
more than 60 threads ?
System is Fedora 10.
It's being discussed at lkml.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/487
And Cox answere is a bit funny. No signed-off-by a year ago so no inclusion in
the kernel.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/52
/bengan
9:14 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Bengt Gördén<bengan(a)bag.org> wrote:
Den Monday 13 July 2009 23.25.39 skrev Fons
Adriaensen:
ooooh ..... can this mailing list handle the cognitive of lennart as savior?
:)
Hi all,
Just happened to use top with all threads displayed (H).
Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
more than 60 threads ?
System is Fedora 10.
It's being discussed at lkml.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/487
9:21 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:06:18AM +0200, Bengt Gördén wrote:
All I get is some XML related warnings and errors...
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
9:43 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net>wrote;wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:06:18AM +0200, Bengt Gördén
wrote:
All I get is some XML related warnings and errors...
--
FA
Hmmm... perhaps disabling console-kit has wide-reaching ill effects ?!?
;)
14 Jul
14 Jul
1:19 p.m.
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 01:15 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:06:18AM +0200, Bengt Gördén
wrote:
All I get is some XML related warnings and errors...
Same here, you need cookies or something like that enabled...
Long discussion here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fedora/+source/consolekit/+bug/148454
(ending in the lkml citation...)
-- Fernando
9:22 a.m.
[Bengt Gördén]
Den Monday 13 July 2009 23.25.39 skrev Fons
Adriaensen:
I see there are multiple wait options for this ioctl(), but given the
scope is there any reason why this particular one isn't handled via
poll() instead?
Cheers, Tim
Anyone able to explain why console-kit-daemon is running
more than 60 threads ?
System is Fedora 10.
It's being discussed at lkml.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/487
5412
days inactive
5413
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
16 comments
11 participants
participants (11)
-
Bengt Gördén -
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano -
Fons Adriaensen -
hollunder＠gmx.at -
Jan Engelhardt -
Jens M Andreasen -
Juuso Alasuutari -
Mark Vitek -
Paul Davis -
Ralf Mardorf -
Tim Goetze