Didn't came through the lists.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org, linux-audio-dev
<linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
Subject: Re: [LAU] [LAD] Just an information about the state of affairs
- Re: forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:37:48 +0200
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 11:14 +0200, Felix Homann wrote:
Fons, I think you should still clarify your position
on using your
code [snip]
In this case I'm on Fons site. He explained it more than one time, so
there isn't the need to repeat it again and again.
There are several mails from Fons similar to the following, explaining
his point of view.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org>
To: J. Liles <malnourite(a)gmail.com>
Cc: lad <linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
Subject: Re: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 21:28:39 +0000
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:50:41PM -0700, J. Liles wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Fons Adriaensen
<fons(a)linuxaudio.org>wrote;wrote:
'Convenient' is the key word here. Some
people only think
of what's 'convenient' to them, everything else is too much
for their simple minds.
Fons, you have to admit that with comments like that, you're making it
rather hard for those of us trying to be on your side in this matter.
You don't have to be 'on my side'.
Help me understand how this is an evolved, logical
response,
One of the designed-in qualities of Aeolus is that it respects,
as much as is possible within the context of a software emulation,
the traditions of organ building. Which are very conservative,
anti-technology and whatever you want, like it or not.
Any changes that violate that principle, no matter how convenient
to the average user, destroy that quality and consequently harm my
interests as an author. Maybe you find that difficult to understand,
but that's how it is. Maybe the free software community fails to
understand that, in which case I feel completely justified not to
contribute to it.