On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:57:40 +0100, Robert Jonsson
wrote:
What I have noticed is subtle, I have xruns in
both situations but the
rate increases noticeably.
I've been running patched kernels but there are all kinds of parameters
(as I'm sure you know) to tweak before it is sufficiently solid.
I would consider my findings pretty much expected behaviour with a less
then perfectly tuned system.
The real problem is that it's so very very hard to tune a system
sufficiently without hours and hours of work. It would be very nice if
there was some way to automate, atleast parts of, the process.
I didn't have to put any real effort in on my PC (RH8, ide, athlon),
I just installed a patched kernel from Planet CCRMA and rebooted.
I get xruns at 64 samples/period (and 128 with heavy disk load), but I
think that's a problem with the ext3 filesystem - others have reported this
too. I'm happy at 256 so I haven't bothered remounting the partition to
find out.
JACK/no JACK makes no noticable difference to the xruns.
Well, as I asked David, care to describe your setup that provides such
wonderful performance?
/Robert