27 Mar
2007
27 Mar
'07
8:22 a.m.
Hello,
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither on
Linux related nor electronic music ones. Tonight I want blog myself some
(subjective) impression and would like to gather some nice photos, I
have only done some crappy images with my mobile. Then I would start to
bother other blogs to write about it, normally the interest is there.
Cheers,
Malte
--
Malte Steiner
media art + development
-www.block4.com-
27 Mar
27 Mar
9:50 a.m.
Malte Steiner wrote:
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or
newspages, neither
on Linux related nor electronic music ones.
Nope, they're generally not interested. The last time I notified
Slashdot about the conference they put it in their Linux section and it
got little response (except from the typical /. crowd of naysayers.
There was no mention of it at all this year.
LJ didn't think it worthy enough to fund a reporter's trip. AFAIK there
were no official reps from any major music or music tech magazines. The
commercial music software market is small, small enough for the
manufacturers to possibly perceive Linux audio software as a most
unwelcome alternative. And given that those commercial entities fund the
ad revenue of the major music mags, I'm sure they won't especially like
to see articles touting Ardour and Rosegarden running beside the
full-page glossies for Logic et al.
Yeh, yeh, I'm riding my same old hobby horse.
We are, as we have been always, quite on our own in this little pocket
universe of ours.
I imagine Daniel James will get a report into Linux User & Developer. I
hope so, since he's the editor of the mag. ;)
Maybe Frank B will get something into c't ?
I plan to go through some of the audio fiels from the presentations, I'd
like to provide some kind of report on the conference in my blog.
Best,
dp
10:20 a.m.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:46 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
Malte Steiner wrote:
I agree that not many people that aren't directly involved with Linux
audio software care about it, but the Slashdot crowd is hardly
representative for most Linux and free software users. I hope.
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs
or newspages, neither
on Linux related nor electronic music ones.
Nope, they're generally not interested. The last time I notified
Slashdot about the conference they put it in their Linux section and it
got little response (except from the typical /. crowd of naysayers.
There was no mention of it at all this year. LJ didn't think it worthy enough to fund a
reporter's trip. AFAIK there
were no official reps from any major music or music tech magazines. The
commercial music software market is small, small enough for the
manufacturers to possibly perceive Linux audio software as a most
unwelcome alternative.
Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton though?
--ll
10:51 a.m.
Lars Luthman wrote:
I agree that not many people that aren't directly
involved with Linux
audio software care about it, but the Slashdot crowd is hardly
representative for most Linux and free software users. I hope.
It's not the crowd that's at issue, it's the fact that a great many /.
readers who might be interested never find out about the conference (or
much else about Linux audio achievements). Regardless how I feel about
it, Slashdot is a widely read site. I don't think anyone announced it on
Digg either. Was anything up on YouTube ?
Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton though?
They are listed as one of the partners. AFAIK they've shown no public
interest in Linux, nor have they announced any intention to port their
products to Linux. Perhaps they made some statement at the conference ?
Anyone know exactly what their interest in Linux amounts to ?
Best,
dp
10:58 a.m.
11:12 a.m.
Dave Phillips wrote:
Lars Luthman wrote:
They didn't express anything special during the conference. One of their
founders (at least I think he is) was there, and apparently he's an old
student of TU-Berlin, and TU-Berlin just asked.
During the panel discussion he basically said that the "sell
shrinkwrapped boxes" model works pretty fine for them and that he
doesn't see any reasons for them to change. And I think he also said
that he didn't see any opportunities for open source in that field.
Now that I write it down like this, I'm even more puzzled as to why they
actually sponsored. Maybe my mental recorder is somehow broken and I
don't remember things correctly.
Pieter
Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton
though?
They are listed as one of the partners. AFAIK they've shown no public
interest in Linux, nor have they announced any intention to port their
products to Linux. Perhaps they made some statement at the conference ?
Anyone know exactly what their interest in Linux amounts to ? 
11:20 a.m.
On Tuesday 27 Mar 2007 14:08, Pieter Palmers wrote:
During the panel discussion he basically said that the
"sell
shrinkwrapped boxes" model works pretty fine for them and that he
doesn't see any reasons for them to change. And I think he also said
that he didn't see any opportunities for open source in that field.
Now that I write it down like this, I'm even more puzzled as to why
they actually sponsored. Maybe my mental recorder is somehow broken
and I don't remember things correctly.
I remember it much the same way. I was a bit hungover though.
I'm guessing that whatever they sponsored was probably quite affordable
and it was just an opportunity to meet up with people from the old uni,
see what Linux developers are doing, and/or evangelise to us about the
delights of the proprietary software model.
Chris
12:07 p.m.
Pieter Palmers wrote:
Dave Phillips wrote:
Hi Pieter,
yes, since one of the founders was a student Ableton helped out. It was
not a statement towards Linux or open source.
Best,
Simon
Lars Luthman wrote:
They didn't express anything special during the conference. One of
their founders (at least I think he is) was there, and apparently he's
an old student of TU-Berlin, and TU-Berlin just asked. Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton
though?
They are listed as one of the partners. AFAIK they've shown no public
interest in Linux, nor have they announced any intention to port
their products to Linux. Perhaps they made some statement at the
conference ? Anyone know exactly what their interest in Linux amounts
to ? 
12:19 p.m.
Hallo,
Pieter Palmers hat gesagt: // Pieter Palmers wrote:
They didn't express anything special during the
conference. One of their
founders (at least I think he is) was there, and apparently he's an old
student of TU-Berlin, and TU-Berlin just asked.
During the panel discussion he basically said that the "sell
shrinkwrapped boxes" model works pretty fine for them and that he
doesn't see any reasons for them to change. And I think he also said
that he didn't see any opportunities for open source in that field.
Now that I write it down like this, I'm even more puzzled as to why they
actually sponsored. Maybe my mental recorder is somehow broken and I
don't remember things correctly.
As I remember what Ableton-Founder Gerhard Behles said was that he
likes running a successful business with Ableton Live as a
shrinkwrapped product, but that trying to sell shrinkwrapped open
source Linux sound software at least currently wouldn't work. And that
is something that we all basically know: Not many people would buy a
shrink wrapped Ardour when it's available as a free download. (Many
people also don't buy shrinkwrapped Ableton Live because it's
available illegally as a free download, but enough people still do.)
Regarding the sponsoring: I think, it was a nice move by Ableton to
support the LAC, even though we're not the target audience for Live
and potential competitors. But still the demo-CDs with Live on it were
gone quite fast. Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live,
but it's not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
12:57 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live,
but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are probably many of us thinking the same way.
But the sad fact is that if all Linux users do this, then
Linux will forever be an 'amateur' platform. From the PoV
of a professional audio user (i.e. one who makes his/her
living by providing services in that area), if a product
does the job and has the right price, there is no good
reason for not using it.
--
FA
Follie! Follie! Delirio vano è questo !
1:58 p.m.
On 27 Mar 2007, at 16:01, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank
Barknecht wrote:
I mostly agree, but in some ways the acceptable quality of the linux
audio offerings makes proprietary software less necessary. OTOH, for
processing photos I mainly use proprietary software (Lightroom,
Bibble [on Linux] and Capture NX), as the free software options are
simply not up to the job. For comparison the only proprietary music
software I use is to control some dedicated synth hardware.
Obviously I'd prefer to use 100% free software, but I'm more
pragmatic than ideological.
- Steve
Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of
Live, but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are probably many of us thinking the same way.
But the sad fact is that if all Linux users do this, then
Linux will forever be an 'amateur' platform. From the PoV
of a professional audio user (i.e. one who makes his/her
living by providing services in that area), if a product
does the job and has the right price, there is no good
reason for not using it. 
28 Mar
28 Mar
1:45 a.m.
Steve Harris wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007, at 16:01, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
The potential of using Linux to compete with proprietary music software is
enormous. Perhaps, the music technologies are still young that's why we
have not yet seen impact of Linux music software in the professional music
world.
I agree that there is a very limited audience of those who use Linux for
their music creation needs. We will need dedicated programmers to focus on
particular fields in order to create software that will be even better than
non open-source software.
I will have to admit that I resorted to start programming music
applications in Linux because of frustration from the win32 API and the
limitation of the windows sound API.
It took me some months to be able to come up with my own implementation of
the MIDI protocol and to be able to play with ALSA. However, those months
and the years of preparation before that, made me realize that a
combination of music knowledge and linux programming knowledge can result
in the creation of good music software.
Passionate musicians who are at the same time passionate and hard-core
Linux programmers are probably few, but given a little bit more time, I
see Linux as a music platform that will directly compete with the world's
most known audio and music brands.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Best Regards,
Carlo
--
Carlo Florendo
Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator
Astra Philippines Inc.
UP-Ayala Technopark, Diliman 1101, Quezon City
Philippines
http://www.astra.ph
--
The Astra Group of Companies
5-3-11 Sekido, Tama City
Tokyo 206-0011, Japan
http://www.astra.co.jp
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank
Barknecht wrote:
I mostly agree, but in some ways the acceptable quality of the linux
audio offerings makes proprietary software less necessary. OTOH, for
processing photos I mainly use proprietary software (Lightroom, Bibble
[on Linux] and Capture NX), as the free software options are simply not
up to the job. For comparison the only proprietary music software I use
is to control some dedicated synth hardware. Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of
Live, but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are probably many of us thinking the same way.
But the sad fact is that if all Linux users do this, then
Linux will forever be an 'amateur' platform. From the PoV
of a professional audio user (i.e. one who makes his/her
living by providing services in that area), if a product
does the job and has the right price, there is no good
reason for not using it. 
27 Mar
27 Mar
2:20 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank
Barknecht wrote:
I know it's not really what you mean, but it seems to me that duplicating
the current methodologies and replacing every "professional" costly
application with an exact free software counterpart that happens to run
under linux is a bit pointless? What is the the motivation? Just to force
businesses out of business?
Surely a better approach is to make free software that does things costly
software simply can't do - or at least try out new approaches that are too
risky for a company to attempt.
I know I'm a minority, but the thing that makes linux for me is that it's
full of eccentric, strange and individual applications - yes sometimes
they don't work, it's frustrating to an alarming degree on occasion, but
it's so much more _interesting_ to make music with than than a handful of
polished products aimed at potential lifestyle marketplaces.
cheers,
dave
Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of
Live, but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are probably many of us thinking the same way.
But the sad fact is that if all Linux users do this, then
Linux will forever be an 'amateur' platform. From the PoV
of a professional audio user (i.e. one who makes his/her
living by providing services in that area), if a product
does the job and has the right price, there is no good
reason for not using it. 
2:45 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
I know it's not really what you mean, but it seems to me that duplicating
the current methodologies and replacing every "professional" costly
application with an exact free software counterpart that happens to run
under linux is a bit pointless? What is the the motivation? Just to force
businesses out of business?
Yeah, well I would prefer the approach of making software that fulfils
specific needs or wants as good as possible. That can often mean going
in similar directions as propietary apps, but never just blind cloning :)
--
Thorsten Wilms
Thorwil's Creature Illustrations:
http://www.printfection.com/thorwil
28 Mar
28 Mar
1:49 a.m.
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Dave
Griffiths wrote:
Exactly. Programmer-musicians must focus on very particular niches,
writing software that would not be a one-stop-do-all kind of thing, but to
address a particular need of a particular audience.
One example is to come up with a software that is tailored for
professional keyboardists who could throw in a live concert using keyboards
and computers, and not just for the general type of musical arranger that
just "uses" the keyboard to compose songs.
Best Regards,
Carlo
--
Carlo Florendo
Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator
Astra Philippines Inc.
UP-Ayala Technopark, Diliman 1101, Quezon City
Philippines
http://www.astra.ph
--
The Astra Group of Companies
5-3-11 Sekido, Tama City
Tokyo 206-0011, Japan
http://www.astra.co.jp
I know it's not really what you mean, but it
seems to me that duplicating
the current methodologies and replacing every "professional" costly
application with an exact free software counterpart that happens to run
under linux is a bit pointless? What is the the motivation? Just to force
businesses out of business?
Yeah, well I would prefer the approach of making software that fulfils
specific needs or wants as good as possible. That can often mean going
in similar directions as propietary apps, but never just blind cloning :)
27 Mar
27 Mar
6:27 p.m.
Hallo,
Fons Adriaensen hat gesagt: // Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank
Barknecht wrote:
Linux didn't stay an "amateuer" platform in other areas, why should
free software not be professionally used in the audio world as well?
An interesting example would be Pd, which is attracting quite a number
of former Max users. Pd may not look professional, but it *is* used by
professionals. Ardour is another example, though it targets an
audience that may be less willing to try something new and thus has a
harder time.
I have nothing against people using proprietary software, especially
in areas where there are no alternatives - although the hundreds of
"soundsalike" (sorry, Michael) Live users can get on my nerves a bit.
But it will be hard to convince *me* of why I should pay more for a
software when I get less in return, that is: no source code and no
copies allowed.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of
Live, but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are probably many of us thinking the same way.
But the sad fact is that if all Linux users do this, then
Linux will forever be an 'amateur' platform.
8:50 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Linux didn't stay an "amateuer" platform
in other areas, why should
free software not be professionally used in the audio world as well?
There is no good reason why free software shouldn't be used, but not
everything required in the pro world is available as free software.
That in itself is not the problem, pro users will be prepared to pay
for what they need. The real problem is that some things are not
available for Linux _at all_.
Try to find an MLP encoder that runs on Linux. Required for DVD-A,
HD-DVD and Blu-Ray production. It won't be open source any time
soon.
If there is no market for closed source software on Linux, it will
simply never exist on that platform. If Linux users refuse to use
non-free software, there is no market.
Much as I would prefer to see FLAC used on these media, the simple
fact is that it isn't.
--
FA
Follie! Follie! Delirio vano è questo !
10:53 a.m.
I agree that not many people that aren't directly
involved with Linux
audio software care about it, but the Slashdot crowd is hardly
representative for most Linux and free software users. I hope.
There are some other blogs which should be notified, e.g.
createdigitalmusic.com
http://www.pro-linux.de/
sequencer.de
the last one also have a small printed German synthesizer magazine and
recently I was asked to write about OpenSource stuff. In the next issue
there will be an article about AMS and now I am about to write an
article about csound. I made sequencer and create to announce the
conference and on create there was at least mentionend the trinity
during LAC:
http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/03/23/linux-powered-mobile-trinity-daw-i…
I dont know what is about Computer Music Journal, I have to renew my
subscription as soon as I get some money.
Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton though?
Yes it was, which is a bit strange.
Cheers,
Malte
--
Malte Steiner
media art + development
-www.block4.com-
10:26 a.m.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:46 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
Malte Steiner wrote:
For next year, how about sending a press-release to:
http://www.harmony-central.com/news_submissions.html
They appear to me as being fairly Linux friendly?
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs
or newspages, neither
on Linux related nor electronic music ones.
Nope, they're generally not interested. [...]
10:56 a.m.
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
For next year, how about sending a press-release to:
http://www.harmony-central.com/news_submissions.html
They appear to me as being fairly Linux friendly?
Not that I can tell (and I do like Harmony Central, I recommend it to my
students).
They have an outdated page of UNIX (sic) software. They have no forum
dedicated to Linux (not that I think they ought to; but they don't).
But I agree, press releases should go out to H-C and all the guns in the
industry.
Best,
dp
10:59 a.m.
We are, as we have been always, quite on our own in
this little pocket
universe of ours.
I think this issue is amplified by the fact that the conference also targets
by and large the same crowd. I am also not convinced that we would not be
able to find some software allies provided we begin catering to more diverse
audience... Linuxaudio.org consortium already has several high-profile pro
audio members.
Stay tuned for more updates in the coming weeks. This summer may introduce
hopefully some cool additions to the Linuxaudio.org.
Ico
6:39 p.m.
Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
what's the difference between Linux-Audio-Developer meeting and
Linux-Audio-Conference?
historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this year was different:
Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
two days ;-)
what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Students lingering
during week but not the weekend next year?
I suggest a single (no parallel) devel-track next year - maybe some
workshops can overlap or be in parallel with the last devel-talk of the
day, which can be a demo..
all other tracks should be for general audience: musicians, home-users
or professionals. Leaving the devs to attend, chat, hack, live-code or
redo their presentation in a different style..
as for promoting Linux-Audio, what about setting up a "Music Made with
Linux" webradio station? - what happened to all the audio-transmittals
of LAC? is there an archive?
robin
We are, as we
have been always, quite on our own in this little pocket
universe of ours.
I think this issue is amplified by the fact that the conference also targets
by and large the same crowd.
8:02 p.m.
Hallo,
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this year
was different:
Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
two days ;-)
what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Students lingering
during week but not the weekend next year?
The Academy of Media Arts (KHM) in Cologne, where the next conference
is planned to be, is much smaller than the TU Berlin. Additionally the
KHM is in a different part of town from the main Cologne University.
As the conference must happen during the semester break, there might
even be more LAC people at the KHM than students. So while Cologne
won't be as centered around one place as in Karlsruhe, it will still
be a bit cozier than Berlin and won't have that many stairs to climb
or large avenues to cross.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
8:20 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] promoting LAC 2007
On 3/28/07, Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> wrote:
Hallo,
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
And Köln is cool as far as I can remember from an old school trip ;-)
Looking forward to that !
--
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Markinoko.
historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this
year was different:
Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
two days ;-)
what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Students lingering
during week but not the weekend next year?
The Academy of Media Arts (KHM) in Cologne, where the next conference
is planned to be, is much smaller than the TU Berlin. Additionally the
KHM is in a different part of town from the main Cologne University.
As the conference must happen during the semester break, there might
even be more LAC people at the KHM than students. So while Cologne
won't be as centered around one place as in Karlsruhe, it will still
be a bit cozier than Berlin and won't have that many stairs to climb
or large avenues to cross.
28 Mar
28 Mar
1:53 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] promoting LAC 2007
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
I've got fond memories of Cologne. It would be good to have LAC 2008 there :)
Best Regards,
Carlo
--
Carlo Florendo
Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator
Astra Philippines Inc.
UP-Ayala Technopark, Diliman 1101, Quezon City
Philippines
http://www.astra.ph
--
The Astra Group of Companies
5-3-11 Sekido, Tama City
Tokyo 206-0011, Japan
http://www.astra.co.jp
historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this
year was different:
Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
two days ;-)
what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Students lingering
during week but not the weekend next year?
The Academy of Media Arts (KHM) in Cologne, where the next conference
is planned to be, is much smaller than the TU Berlin. Additionally the
KHM is in a different part of town from the main Cologne University.
As the conference must happen during the semester break, there might
even be more LAC people at the KHM than students. So while Cologne
won't be as centered around one place as in Karlsruhe, it will still
be a bit cozier than Berlin and won't have that many stairs to climb
or large avenues to cross.
Ciao 
30 Mar
30 Mar
2:50 p.m.
Hiho,
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 00:01, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
Actually, in Berlin it was also the semester break, so I wonder how many of
the casual visitors were actually students, just happening to pass by on the
way to another lecture. Perhaps it was more a case of there being less
competition for other events on week days in Berlin.
sincerely,
Marije
historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this
year was different:
Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
two days ;-)
what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Students lingering
during week but not the weekend next year?
The Academy of Media Arts (KHM) in Cologne, where the next conference
is planned to be, is much smaller than the TU Berlin. Additionally the
KHM is in a different part of town from the main Cologne University.
As the conference must happen during the semester break, there might
even be more LAC people at the KHM than students. So while Cologne
won't be as centered around one place as in Karlsruhe, it will still
be a bit cozier than Berlin and won't have that many stairs to climb
or large avenues to cross. 
1 Apr
1 Apr
12:13 a.m.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:46 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
[...] The
commercial music software market is small, small enough for the
manufacturers to possibly perceive Linux audio software as a most
unwelcome alternative. And given that those commercial entities fund the
ad revenue of the major music mags, I'm sure they won't especially like
to see articles touting Ardour and Rosegarden running beside the
full-page glossies for Logic et al.
Yeh, yeh, I'm riding my same old hobby horse.
We are, as we have been always, quite on our own in this little pocket
universe of ours.
Wouldn't have it any other way :)
-DR-
27 Mar
27 Mar
1:55 p.m.
Hiho,
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:25, Malte Steiner wrote:
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or
newspages, neither on
Linux related nor electronic music ones.
For what it's worth:
the TU PR did actually quite a good job at promoting the conference.
I did not get a complete overview of where the conference was mentioned, but I
know that at least at www.heise.de there was an elaborate discussion on the
conference.
Radio:
Michael Iber from the SWR made a report (as usual).
Furthermore, we had interviews from two Berlin radio stations: Deutschland
Radio Berlin and Motor FM (100.6 FM).
And we have of course our own CampusRadio interviews.
The Computer Music Journal is interested in an article about the conference,
we just need to write it (anyone who would like to help with this and was at
the conference, please contact me).
Sincerely,
Marije
6:35 p.m.
Hallo,
nescivi hat gesagt: // nescivi wrote:
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:25, Malte Steiner wrote:
The text of the feature on Deutschlandradio Berlin is here:
http://www.dradio.de/dkultur/sendungen/ewelten/607518/ (in German)
I'll see if I can get an mp3 of that tomorrow.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs
or newspages, neither on
Linux related nor electronic music ones.
For what it's worth:
the TU PR did actually quite a good job at promoting the conference.
I did not get a complete overview of where the conference was mentioned, but I
know that at least at www.heise.de there was an elaborate discussion on the
conference.
Radio:
Michael Iber from the SWR made a report (as usual).
Furthermore, we had interviews from two Berlin radio stations: Deutschland
Radio Berlin and Motor FM (100.6 FM). 
28 Mar
28 Mar
3:29 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] FPS on LAC2007@TU-Berlin
Hi,
I thought you'll be curious about some blogging of mine, about my
attendance to this year's LAC2007@TU-Berlin, so there it goes:
- Back from LAC2007@TU-Berlin - The Aftermath
http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/18
All photos that I took during my stay can be reached from a small
gallery as the same:
http://www.rncbc.org/lac2007
Feel free to comment (reg. required though)
Cheers.
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org
29 Mar
29 Mar
11:37 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] FPS on LAC2007@TU-Berlin
Hi,
I'm not sure if this link has been posted:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/spanish/misc/newsid_6500000/6500231.stm
Looks like it's only in spanish. Pretty weird...
Cheers,
Andrés
Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Hi,
I thought you'll be curious about some blogging of mine, about my
attendance to this year's LAC2007@TU-Berlin, so there it goes:
- Back from LAC2007@TU-Berlin - The Aftermath
http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/18
All photos that I took during my stay can be reached from a small
gallery as the same:
http://www.rncbc.org/lac2007
Feel free to comment (reg. required though)
Cheers.
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org
6235
days inactive
6239
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
30 comments
20 participants
participants (20)
-
Andres Cabrera -
Carlo Florendo -
Chris Cannam -
Dave Griffiths -
Dave Phillips -
Dave Robillard -
Fons Adriaensen -
Frank Barknecht -
Ivica Ico Bukvic -
Jens M Andreasen -
Lars Luthman -
Malte Steiner -
Marc-Olivier Barre -
nescivi -
Pieter Palmers -
Robin Gareus -
Rui Nuno Capela -
Simon Schampijer -
Steve Harris -
Thorsten Wilms