17 Apr
2006
17 Apr
'06
9:10 a.m.
What's the consensus? Implement patch storage for plugins that don't
really have that many controls, or just let the host worry about it?
Gordon.
17 Apr
17 Apr
11:39 a.m.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:08:19 +0100
Gordonjcp <wsynth(a)gjcp.net> wrote:
What's the consensus? Implement patch storage for
plugins that don't
really have that many controls, or just let the host worry about it?
Dunno, if there's concencus, but i'd say, let the host worry about it.
There's many plugins where patches aren't really necessary (simple stuff
like i.e. my dssi_convolve).
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
12:14 p.m.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 12:08 +0100, Gordonjcp wrote:
What's the consensus? Implement patch storage for
plugins that don't
really have that many controls, or just let the host worry about it?
I suppose it depends on whether you want to be able to ship some presets
with the plugin and have presets saved in one host available in all
others. If not there's no point in implementing DSSI program handling in
the plugin.
--
Lars Luthman
PGP key: http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
6593
days inactive
6593
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Florian Schmidt -
Gordonjcp -
Lars Luthman