8 Mar
2008
8 Mar
'08
12:35 a.m.
Hi all,
After a very long time indeed, I am in the final stages of
a new release for Secret Rabbit Code aka libsamplerate.
The big news is that I found a way to drastically improve the quality of
the SFC_SINC_MEDIUM_QUALITY and SRC_SINC_BEST_QUALITY converters.
For more info on that, see this blog entry:
http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/Blog/CodeHacking/SecretRabbitCode/progress.h…
I'm aiming for the new release to happen next weekend.
Cheers,
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Question #10342: Ruling on a Muslim eating with a kaafir
http://islamqa.com/index.php?ln=eng&ds=qa&lv=browse&QR=10342&am…
8 Mar
8 Mar
1:03 a.m.
On 08/03/2008, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la(a)mega-nerd.com> wrote:
Hi all,
After a very long time indeed, I am in the final stages of
a new release for Secret Rabbit Code aka libsamplerate.
The big news is that I found a way to drastically improve the quality of
the SFC_SINC_MEDIUM_QUALITY and SRC_SINC_BEST_QUALITY converters.
Congratulations, Erik. I know you've been through a few iterations and
the results you've come up with are well worth the wait :-)
For more info on that, see this blog entry:
http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/Blog/CodeHacking/SecretRabbitCode/progress.h…
I'm aiming for the new release to happen next weekend.
great! and thanks for making the new converters a transparent upgrade.
It looks like there's not even much reason for applications to add
explicit support for the old converters, but if they did, would an
AC_CHECK_DEFINE on one of the _OLD_ names be enough to check if they
are present, and are there any other API changes at all?
cheers,
Conrad.
1:14 a.m.
Conrad Parker wrote:
Congratulations, Erik.
Thanks.
great! and thanks for making the new converters a
transparent upgrade.
It looks like there's not even much reason for applications to add
explicit support for the old converters, but if they did, would an
AC_CHECK_DEFINE on one of the _OLD_ names be enough to check if they
are present, and are there any other API changes at all?
I actually do intend to drop the SRC_OLD_SINC_* converters by the time
of the 0.1.3 official release.
I only really enabled them for this pre-release so people can easily
do A/B testing without compiling against two versions of the library.
Cheers,
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"... a discussion of C++'s strengths and flaws always sounds
like an argument about whether one should face north or east
when one is sacrificing one's goat to the rain god."
-- Thant Tessman
1:13 p.m.
Le Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:35:47 +1100,
Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la(a)mega-nerd.com> a écrit :
Hi all,
After a very long time indeed, I am in the final stages of
a new release for Secret Rabbit Code aka libsamplerate.
The big news is that I found a way to drastically improve the quality of
the SFC_SINC_MEDIUM_QUALITY and SRC_SINC_BEST_QUALITY converters.
For more info on that, see this blog entry:
http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/Blog/CodeHacking/SecretRabbitCode/progress.h…
I'm aiming for the new release to happen next weekend.
Cheers,
Erik
Thank you for such a great work!
Dominique
--
Dominique Michel
Mes 3 projets préférés auxquels je contribue:
* FVWM-Crystal, le bureau basé sur FVWM:
http://fvwm-crystal.org
* AlsaPlayer, le lecteur audio avec contrôle de vitesse en continu:
www.alsaplayer.org
* L'overlay pour la MAO sous gentoo:
http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
5900
days inactive
5901
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Conrad Parker -
Dominique Michel -
Erik de Castro Lopo