18 Mar
2010
18 Mar
'10
5:57 p.m.
Has anybody been able to build freqtweak 0.7.2 using gcc 4.4.x recently? There are some
missing stdint.h includes, but beyond that there is some loss of precision errors that are
over my head.
-Reuben
18 Mar
18 Mar
6:28 p.m.
Reuben Martin wrote:
Has anybody been able to build freqtweak 0.7.2 using
gcc 4.4.x recently?
I'm just setting up a new machine (Debian testing/unstable) and yes,
I got all sorts of compile failures.
There are some missing stdint.h includes, but beyond
that there is some
loss of precision errors that are over my head.
I didn't even get that far.
Is anyone still maintaining this? If not, I might adopt it.
Cheers,
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
7:50 p.m.
Yo, back on Thursday 18 March 2010 Erik de Castro Lopo was all like:
Reuben Martin wrote:
FTutils.hpp needs a "#include <stdint.h>" added to it. It's to do with
changes made in gcc 4.4 to do with headers.
Has anybody been able to build freqtweak 0.7.2
using gcc 4.4.x recently?
I'm just setting up a new machine (Debian testing/unstable) and yes,
I got all sorts of compile failures.
There are some missing stdint.h includes, but
beyond that there is some
loss of precision errors that are over my head.
I didn't even get that far.
Is anyone still maintaining this? If not, I might adopt it.
There really needs to be a "Linux Audio Hospice" website (Tag line:
"...where cool audio projects go to die") to act as an upstream to keep track of
patches from the various distros for projects that are popular but no longer maintained.
Fortunately Jesse Chappell (author of freqtweak) is still around, but not as active as he
once was. Kinda happens when you get a real job and a life.
-Reuben
8:10 p.m.
Reuben Martin wrote:
FTutils.hpp needs a "#include
<stdint.h>" added to it. It's to do
with changes made in gcc 4.4 to do with headers.
That wasn't the problem I ran into. My problem was that sig++/sig++.h
wasn't found even though I have installed libsigc++-2.0-dev.
Basically a bit of autofoo/pkg-config magic is needed to fix this.
There really needs to be a "Linux Audio
Hospice" website (Tag line:
"...where cool audio projects go to die") to act as an upstream to
keep track of patches from the various distros for projects that are
popular but no longer maintained.
Keeping patches is a pain. What you need is to have the projects
themselves in revision control where someone keeps them up to date
and does proper releases.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
19 Mar
19 Mar
8:11 a.m.
On 03/19/2010 12:10 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Reuben Martin wrote:
iirc it needs libsigc++-1.x, in addition to the usual #include stuff.
FTutils.hpp needs a
"#include<stdint.h>" added to it. It's to do
with changes made in gcc 4.4 to do with headers.
That wasn't the problem I ran into. My problem was that sig++/sig++.h
wasn't found even though I have installed libsigc++-2.0-dev.
Basically a bit of autofoo/pkg-config magic is needed to fix this.
5:52 p.m.
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 03/19/2010 12:10 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Well eventually libsigc++-1.x will disappear and it will need to be
ported to the current version.
This is why someone needs to maintain this. I'll email Jesse Chappell.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
That wasn't the problem I ran into. My
problem was that sig++/sig++.h
wasn't found even though I have installed libsigc++-2.0-dev.
Basically a bit of autofoo/pkg-config magic is needed to fix this.
iirc it needs libsigc++-1.x, in addition to the usual #include stuff. 
20 Mar
20 Mar
12:08 a.m.
I'm still around, but oh man, I've been neglecting freqtweak for
years. If distro maintainers ever notified me about anything I might
actually be prompted to spend the few hours getting everything back in
order. Even sooperlooper has been neglected for too long. Yes, I
need to update to sigc++2 quite badly.
For those who wonder what I have been doing in my audio software
spare-time, check out http://thumbjam.com .
In the meantime I really will try to update FT soon.
jlc
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
<mle+la(a)mega-nerd.com> wrote:
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 03/19/2010 12:10 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo
wrote:
Well eventually libsigc++-1.x will disappear and it will need to be
ported to the current version.
This is why someone needs to maintain this. I'll email Jesse Chappell.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
That wasn't the problem I ran into. My
problem was that sig++/sig++.h
wasn't found even though I have installed libsigc++-2.0-dev.
Basically a bit of autofoo/pkg-config magic is needed to fix this.
iirc it needs libsigc++-1.x, in addition to the usual #include stuff.
12:18 a.m.
Jesse Chappell wrote:
I'm still around,
Oh, good!
but oh man, I've been neglecting freqtweak for
years. If distro maintainers ever notified me about anything I might
actually be prompted to spend the few hours getting everything back in
order. Even sooperlooper has been neglected for too long. Yes, I
need to update to sigc++2 quite badly.
For those who wonder what I have been doing in my audio software
spare-time, check out http://thumbjam.com .
In the meantime I really will try to update FT soon.
Well maybe the first step would be to get it under revision control,
preferably of the distriuted kind (Bzr, Darcs, Git, Mercurial etc).
The at least people can get your current version, polish it locally
and send you patches.
Cheers,
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
1:46 a.m.
Yo, back on Friday 19 March 2010 Erik de Castro Lopo was all like:
It's always been hosted on SourceForge using SVN
Jesse Chappell wrote:
Adding the includes and using sigc++ weren't much of an issue for me. I'm running
into issues where gcc throws errors and fails, complaining about loss of precision from
data types used.
I'm still around,
Oh, good!
> but oh man, I've been neglecting freqtweak for
> years. If distro maintainers ever notified me about anything I might
> actually be prompted to spend the few hours getting everything back in
> order. Even sooperlooper has been neglected for too long. Yes, I
> need to update to sigc++2 quite badly.
> For those who
wonder what I have been doing in my audio software
spare-time, check out http://thumbjam.com .
In the meantime I really will try to update FT soon.
Well maybe the first step would be to get it under revision control,
preferably of the distriuted kind (Bzr, Darcs, Git, Mercurial etc).
The at least people can get your current version,
polish it locally
and send you patches.
-Reuben
2:44 a.m.
Reuben Martin wrote:
Yo, back on Friday 19 March 2010 Erik de Castro Lopo
was all like:
I can only find CVS (which is truely horrible).
Also SVN is revision control but is not distributed revision control.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
Well maybe the first step would be to get it
under revision control,
preferably of the distriuted kind (Bzr, Darcs, Git, Mercurial etc).
It's always been hosted on SourceForge using SVN
2:58 a.m.
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I can only find CVS (which is truely horrible).
And the CVS version seems to be 0.7.1, while the last release was
0.7.2.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
4:45 a.m.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 04:57:56PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
the diff between 0,7.2 and the cvs head is really small:
http://hochstrom.endofinternet.org/cgit/freqtweak.git/commit/?id=daafe19d21…
--
torben Hohn
I can only find CVS (which is truely horrible).
And the CVS version seems to be 0.7.1, while the last release was
0.7.2.
2:42 a.m.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:18:13PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Jesse Chappell wrote:
i converted the cvs repo to git and switched the codebase to sigc-2.0
also fixed a few 64bit errors on the way.
it compiles and seems to work.
however there is no scrollbar at the side.
and i got a couple of wx deprecation warnings.
oh well...
git clone git://hochstrom.endofinternet.org/freqtweak.git
cgit is here:
http://hochstrom.endofinternet.org/cgit/freqtweak.git/
I'm still around,
Oh, good!
but oh man, I've been neglecting freqtweak
for
years. If distro maintainers ever notified me about anything I might
actually be prompted to spend the few hours getting everything back in
order. Even sooperlooper has been neglected for too long. Yes, I
need to update to sigc++2 quite badly.
For those who wonder what I have been doing in my audio software
spare-time, check out http://thumbjam.com .
In the meantime I really will try to update FT soon.
Well maybe the first step would be to get it under revision control,
preferably of the distriuted kind (Bzr, Darcs, Git, Mercurial etc).
The at least people can get your current version, polish it locally
and send you patches.
Cheers,
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
--
torben Hohn
5312
days inactive
5314
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
13 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Erik de Castro Lopo -
Jesse Chappell -
Jörn Nettingsmeier -
Reuben Martin -
torbenh