29 Jul
2004
29 Jul
'04
2 p.m.
From: Dave Robillard
<drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>
The question is, which implementation is best? All I can find is
Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the
advantages/drawbacks of each? I can find very little information on any
of them.
Last I checked OSC, it had Lisp/Scheme like syntax. Don't know
if that is a drawback --- anyone?
Has anyone used MPI (Message Passing Interface) for this?
People use these for high performance parallel computations
in Linux clusters. MPI itself is a standard supported by academic
and by vendors. MPI is used, e.g., in supercomputers.
See, e.g.,
http://www.csc.fi/reports/pc-cluster/Finalreport.pdf
Juhana
--
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-graphics-dev
for developers of open source graphics software
29 Jul
29 Jul
3:13 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:44:57PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
I doesnt have a s-expression like syntax, and it never has, you could
write OSC expressions in s-expressions, I guess, but theres no reason to.
The syntax has a fairly typical RPC structure: address followed by
typesignature then arguments. The on-the-wire format is binary. liblo
treats it a bit like printf/scanf, but you could stick any API you liked
over it.
I can promise you I wouldn't have touched OSC with a bargepole if it was
based on s-expressions. S-expressions are like XML, but with anonymous
attributes, yuk :)
- Steve
From: Dave
Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>
The question is, which implementation is best? All I can find is
Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the
advantages/drawbacks of each? I can find very little information on any
of them.
Last I checked OSC, it had Lisp/Scheme like syntax. Don't know
if that is a drawback --- anyone?
7513
days inactive
7513
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Juhana Sadeharju -
Steve Harris