26 Nov
2004
26 Nov
'04
5:47 a.m.
Hi Steve, thanks for the reply.
I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
never even heard of it before your post, although
that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and
'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both.
Stefan Turner
It would be more practical to do it as a DSSI
plugin, LADSPA has no way
to
indicate that you want to load files during runtime,
and no UI.
In DSSI you can load the impulse in the "UI"
process, perform the FFT
on
it and send it ot hte DSP code with configure().
Once there the DSP
code
can the overlap-add/save on it.
- Steve
___________________________________________________________
Win a castle for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
26 Nov
26 Nov
9:56 a.m.
New subject: promoting DSSI, was re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
Stefan Turner wrote:
I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
never even heard of it before your post, although
that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and
'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both.
If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio developers to read the
DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's
shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to
see the need for something similar in a native Linux architecture, and I
think DSSI is an excellent way for us to get that. If you don't already
know about it, you can learn more about DSSI here:
http://dssi.sourceforge.net/
Again, if you're a developer, check it out. Some good minds are behind
its design, and Linux audio software truly needs DSSI (or something like).
Best,
dp
3:02 p.m.
New subject: promoting DSSI, was re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:03 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio
developers to read the
DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's
shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to
see the need for something similar in a native Linux architecture, and I
think DSSI is an excellent way for us to get that. If you don't already
know about it, you can learn more about DSSI here:
http://dssi.sourceforge.net/
I second that. I love LADSPA and i appreciate its contribution to Linux
audio in general, and i'm still using it, but DSSI is better pretty much
any way you look at it.
Hopefully the authors of LADSPA plugins will start porting their
software to DSSI.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
4 Dec
4 Dec
9:50 p.m.
New subject: promoting DSSI, was re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:02:43AM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:03 -0500, Dave Phillips
wrote:
For existing LADSPA plugins theres no need to port, if you want to add a
DSSI-style UI you can, but theres no need to change the LADSPA pluign.
- Steve
If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio
developers to read the
DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's
shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to
see the need for something similar in a native Linux architecture, and I
think DSSI is an excellent way for us to get that. If you don't already
know about it, you can learn more about DSSI here:
http://dssi.sourceforge.net/
I second that. I love LADSPA and i appreciate its contribution to Linux
audio in general, and i'm still using it, but DSSI is better pretty much
any way you look at it.
Hopefully the authors of LADSPA plugins will start porting their
software to DSSI. 
12 May
12 May
12:29 a.m.
New subject: promoting DSSI, was re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
Wouldn't it be natural to have midi (triggers,u-nameit) to come along
with the call from jack? One more argument in the call wouldn't break
anything in legacy-applications.
My rationale being that the midi-aware application would like to know
the latest news of the world (and adjust), before doing its
calculations, right? And getting it from jack (running RT) would
guarantee that this really is the latest and truest description of the
midi-world, no?
...
...
Mmmm .. Have we been here before?
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:03 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
Stefan Turner wrote:
--
(
)
c[] // Jens M Andreasen
I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like
it
could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
never even heard of it before your post, although
that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and
'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both.
If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio developers to read the
DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's
shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to
see the need for something similar in a native Linux architecture, and I
think DSSI is an excellent way for us to get that. If you don't already
know about it, you can learn more about DSSI here:
http://dssi.sourceforge.net/
Again, if you're a developer, check it out. Some good minds are behind
its design, and Linux audio software truly needs DSSI (or something like).
Best,
dp
12:51 a.m.
New subject: promoting DSSI, was re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
To clearify:
I got a pissed off with the latest changes of defaults in libpthread of
my favorite distro.
Pouring it all down in jack would mean that everything breaks or nothing
breaks, ie: Detectable!
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 04:29 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Wouldn't it be natural to have midi
(triggers,u-nameit) to come along
with the call from jack? One more argument in the call wouldn't break
anything in legacy-applications.
My rationale being that the midi-aware application would like to know
the latest news of the world (and adjust), before doing its
calculations, right? And getting it from jack (running RT) would
guarantee that this really is the latest and truest description of the
midi-world, no?
...
...
Mmmm .. Have we been here before?
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:03 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Stefan Turner wrote:
>
> >I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
> >could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
> >never even heard of it before your post, although
> >that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
> >eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
> >need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and
> >'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both.
> >
> >
> If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio developers to read the
> DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's
> shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to
> see the need for something similar in a native Linux architecture, and I
> think DSSI is an excellent way for us to get that. If you don't already
> know about it, you can learn more about DSSI here:
>
> http://dssi.sourceforge.net/
>
> Again, if you're a developer, check it out. Some good minds are behind
> its design, and Linux audio software truly needs DSSI (or something like).
>
> Best,
>
> dp
>
>
--
(
)
c[] // Jens M Andreasen
4 Dec
4 Dec
9:49 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:47:54AM +0000, Stefan Turner wrote:
Hi Steve, thanks for the reply.
I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
never even heard of it before your post, although
that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and
'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both.
DSSI is a strict superset of LADSPA, so valid LADSPA plugins are valid
DSSI plugins (IIRC).
So it does not replace LADSPA per se. as a pure effect DSSI plugin is a
LADSPA plugin.
- Steve
6918
days inactive
7084
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Dave Phillips -
Florin Andrei -
Jens M Andreasen -
Stefan Turner -
Steve Harris