19 Apr
2016
19 Apr
'16
3:24 a.m.
I am finding myself motivated to convert from Python 2.7 to Python 3, and I
just realized that PyJack, the Python JACK library I have been using, has
not been set up for Python 3. Anyone have a favorite JACK library for
Python3?
--
*Jonathan E. Brickman jeb(a)ponderworthy.com
<http://login.jsp/?at=02e47df3-a9af-4cd9-b951-1a06d255b48f&mailto=jeb@ponderworthy.com>
(785)233-9977*
*Hear us at http://ponderworthy.com <http://ponderworthy.com> -- CDs and
MP3s now available! <http://ponderworthy.com/ad-astra/ad-astra.html>*
*Music of compassion; fire, and life!!!*
20 Apr
20 Apr
1:50 p.m.
Hi Jonathan.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Brickman wrote:
I am finding myself motivated to convert from Python
2.7 to Python 3, and I
just realized that PyJack, the Python JACK library I have been using, has
not been set up for Python 3. Anyone have a favorite JACK library for
Python3?
I'm probably biased (because I'm its author), but I like this one:
http://jackclient-python.rtfd.org/
It works for both Python 2 and 3.
cheers,
Matthias
5:10 p.m.
Am 20.04.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Matthias Geier:
I'm probably biased (because I'm its author),
but I like this one:
http://jackclient-python.rtfd.org/
Thanks for the link. Not sure, if I had this project already on the radar.
From the documentation:
"Installing NumPy with pip is not recommended."
Why do you write that? I have had no problems installing Numpy numerous
times with pip (on Linux). Are you referring to a system-wide
installation of Numpy? I usually use a virtualenv for every project
anyway, and Numpy installs into virtualenv without problems.
Chris
6:41 p.m.
On Wednesday 20 April 2016 11:10:24 Christopher Arndt wrote:
Your OpenPGP signature is bad coming in here, Christopher.
Am 20.04.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Matthias Geier:
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
I'm probably biased (because I'm its
author), but I like this one:
http://jackclient-python.rtfd.org/
Thanks for the link. Not sure, if I had this project already on the
radar.
From the documentation:
"Installing NumPy with pip is not recommended."
Why do you write that? I have had no problems installing Numpy
numerous times with pip (on Linux). Are you referring to a system-wide
installation of Numpy? I usually use a virtualenv for every project
anyway, and Numpy installs into virtualenv without problems.
Chris
21 Apr
21 Apr
10:14 a.m.
Hello Chris.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Christopher Arndt wrote:
Am 20.04.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Matthias Geier:
Well now you have!
I'm probably biased (because I'm its
author), but I like this one:
http://jackclient-python.rtfd.org/
Thanks for the link. Not sure, if I had this project already on the radar. From the documentation:
"Installing NumPy with pip is not recommended."
Why do you write that? I have had no problems installing Numpy numerous
times with pip (on Linux). Are you referring to a system-wide
installation of Numpy? I usually use a virtualenv for every project
anyway, and Numpy installs into virtualenv without problems.
I don't say it's impossible, I'm just not recommending it.
And mainly, I'm directing this to Python-newbies, advanced Python
users will already know how they prefer to install NumPy and they will
ignore my recommendation anyway.
Those are the reasons for my recommendation:
* installing (including compiling) with pip will take *much* longer
than installing it with apt-get or conda or <binary packet manager of
your choice>.
* compiling NumPy need loads of third-party (non-Python) libraries,
which need to be installed beforehand. If some libraries are not
available, they might be replaced by other, less efficient ones during
compilation. I trust that the Debian people (and the Anaconda people
as well) took the time to choose the proper dependencies and that all
of those are compiled with appropriate flags. If you want to use
hand-tuned compilation settings, you are free to do that, but I guess
a newbie shouldn't be bothered with that.
* Everybody should do "apt-get upgrade" (or equivalent) regularly,
which will keep NumPy up-to-date. That's much more tedious with pip.
I know only one disadvantage:
* The pip version of NumPy might be more recent than a
Debian/conda/... binary package. But I guess that's not really a
problem for a newbie, either.
Does this sound reasonable?
Did I miss anything?
If it turns out that there is a real disadvantage for newbies there,
I'll of course change my recommendation.
cheers,
Matthias
5 p.m.
Am 21.04.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Matthias Geier:
Those are the reasons for my recommendation:
Ok, thanks for the explanation. I was just surprised by the strong
wording. I would have probably written something like "Installing Numpy
via pip is only recommended, if you are experienced with installing
Python packages."
Anyway, it's just a minor thing, I was just curious. I'll try to check
out the package soon.
Chris
24 Apr
24 Apr
9:12 p.m.
Hi Chris.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Christopher Arndt wrote:
Am 21.04.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Matthias Geier:
OK, thanks for the hint, I've changed the wording slightly:
http://jackclient-python.readthedocs.org/en/latest/#requirements
Those are the reasons for my recommendation:
Ok, thanks for the explanation. I was just surprised by the strong
wording. I would have probably written something like "Installing Numpy
via pip is only recommended, if you are experienced with installing
Python packages." Anyway, it's just a minor thing, I was just
curious. I'll try to check
out the package soon.
If you have any further suggestions for improvements, don't hesitate
to open issues/pull requests on Github:
https://github.com/spatialaudio/jackclient-python
This of course applies to everyone who is reading this!
cheers,
Matthias
22 Apr
22 Apr
5:20 a.m.
Greetings, Matthias, and thanks for writing. Indeed I do like your
JACK-Client very much, I am working on converting my JACK process
control library to it right now and you have saved me much code and
complexity!
J.E.B.
On 04/20/2016 06:50 AM, Matthias Geier wrote:
Hi Jonathan.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Brickman wrote:
--
Jonathan E. Brickman jeb(a)ponderworthy.com (785)233-9977
Hear us at http://ponderworthy.com -- CDs and MP3 now available!
<http://ponderworthy.com/ad-astra/ad-astra.html>
Music of compassion; fire, and life!!!
I am finding myself motivated to convert from
Python 2.7 to Python 3, and I
just realized that PyJack, the Python JACK library I have been using, has
not been set up for Python 3. Anyone have a favorite JACK library for
Python3?
I'm probably biased (because I'm its author), but I like this
one:
http://jackclient-python.rtfd.org/
It works for both Python 2 and 3.
cheers,
Matthias 
25 Apr
25 Apr
6:23 p.m.
On 2016-04-20 13:50, Matthias Geier wrote:
Hi Jonathan.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Brickman wrote:
i'm biased as well and involved in PyJack.
well, at least one of the various packages named PyJack, the one started
by Andy Schmeder and hosted at sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/py-jack/
if memory serves me well (and the git logs tell no lies), then i have
added python3 support to the v0.6 version about 3 years ago.
however, afaik we never did a format release (not even tag it), so
that's why there's still v0.5.2 sitting on PyPi, which lacks python3.
fgmasdr
IOhannes
I am finding myself motivated to convert from
Python 2.7 to Python 3, and I
just realized that PyJack, the Python JACK library I have been using, has
not been set up for Python 3. Anyone have a favorite JACK library for
Python3?
I'm probably biased (because I'm its author), but I like this one:
http://jackclient-python.rtfd.org/
It works for both Python 2 and 3.
3063
days inactive
3069
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Christopher Arndt -
Gene Heskett -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Jonathan Brickman -
Jonathan E. Brickman
-
Matthias Geier