Well, the very fact that there is a spec which is to be promoted and
encouraged in order to foster wider adoption sounds like a "project" to me.
Wouldn't it be nice if this spec actually was adopted by commercial
companies as well (you personally may or may not care about this, but I
would bet hat a good number of others may, and the consortium certainly
does)?
This is as far as the "business" aspect goes. The consortium is not here to
police individual projects or to tell them what to do or not do. Rather, the
consortium's mission is to encourage their growth, mutual cooperation, and
ultimately consolidation of linux audio resources to ultimately make audio
on linux "just work(tm?)." And if this is what most of us believe in, then
having LV2 a part of the consortium is certainly a good idea.
Ico
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-dev-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-dev-
bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Thorsten Wilms
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:10 AM
To: linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 and
Linuxaudio.org
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:47:11PM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
To all involved in the LV2 project, I would
greatly appreciate your
feedback
regarding LV2 project becoming a member of
Linuxaudio.org. Provided that
you
decide this is a step they wish to take, it would
be a good idea to
nominate
someone as the representative of the project
within the consortium.
50% of the core team do not even think there is a project (just a spec),
wonder what the point of the consortium is and don't like anything that
smells even remotely of business.
So I would say no, no membership. Unless 1 of the 2 speak up.
Sorry :)
--
Thorsten Wilms