14 Jun
2007
14 Jun
'07
11:43 a.m.
Hello,
Second, I noticed there's a click
between segments when I split then using < X >.
Strange, are you sure you use 0.40.0 ? :D
It would be very helpfull if you could tell me how to reproduce it and/or join
us in #traverso / traverso-devel ml to look into this.
Also, when I used < E > for
an external command (SoX - can this be changed?), the clip then becomes
silent. I typed "reverse" into the box. It did reverse the clip, but like I
said - silence.
The external processing was a feature request from a user, and given the way
traverso works, I stated that creating a Command class to implement the
functionality was easy.
That turned out to be right, but unfortunately, I didn't get much feedback.
The external processing as such is still a somewhat experimental feature, and
the command has been hardcoded to sox.
If there are more people who would like to see this functionality expended,
please drop a note, with what exactly you want to accomplish, how, which
parameters and so on.
:) Anyways, then I split the reversed clip and could
then hear it. Also, no
We did have these problems long ago, weird you have them still....
But it could be related to the external processing not fully tested...
JACK transport support?
Please add a wish for this in the bug tracker [1] !
Regards,
Remon
[1] https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/traverso/
14 Jun
14 Jun
4:08 p.m.
New subject: Fwd: Re: Traverso 0.40.0 Released
>>>> "R" == Remon
<remonsijrier(a)gmail.com> writes:
R> The external processing was a feature request from a user, and
R> given the way traverso works, I stated that creating a Command
R> class to implement the functionality was easy. That turned out
R> to be right, but unfortunately, I didn't get much feedback.
R> The external processing as such is still a somewhat
R> experimental feature, and the command has been hardcoded to
R> sox.
R> If there are more people who would like to see this
R> functionality expended, please drop a note, with what exactly
R> you want to accomplish, how, which parameters and so on.
at least two types of functionalities spring to mind:
1) Edit the clip in question with whatever on the outside: snd,
snd-scripts, sox...
2) having simple access to "inserts" (while playing the track),
interconnecting w. rt-processing through jack: SC3, jamin...
19 Jun
19 Jun
12:04 p.m.
New subject: Traverso, external clip processing
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback, there are some issues though, I'll try to explain.
1) Edit the clip in question with whatever on the
outside: snd,
snd-scripts, sox...
OK, the new external processing dialog has the option to give whatever program
name you want.
Most audio programs assume that the given audiofile has interlaced data in
case of more then 1 channel, right ?
This is a bit of a problem, since Traverso uses one file for each channel ...
Of course, this 'problem' can be fixed by merging the 2 files (in case of a
stereo clip) into one audiofile first, and feed that as argument to sox or
another program
However, is the effect to be applied to the 'raw' audio file, or to the clip ?
In the latter case, the clip needs first to be 'rendered', like if _only_ the
clip is exported, with the Track gain/pan/plugins etc applied to it....?
The former case is how it is now, and I'm not sure which way is preferable...
2) having simple access to "inserts"
(while playing the track),
interconnecting w. rt-processing through jack: SC3, jamin...
Ehm, I suppose this isn't really related to external processing by e.g. sox,
and if it is, would you care to explain it in some more depth ?
Regards,
Remon
6349
days inactive
6354
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
andersvi＠extern.uio.no -
Remon