Linux-audio-user November 2004

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

188 participants
181 discussions

by motorhammer

Hi !! I'm getting some errors when compiling jack_fst. fst compiled just fine. Of course, I did what you say in the readme; I removed the constructors with ../fixheaders and change " VstFileType *fileTypes; // list of fileTypes" to "struct VstFileType *fileTypes; // list of fileTypes". When I run make in the jack_fst-1.2 directory, I'm getting these errors: yves@Yves:~/jack_fst-1.2> make make all-am make[1]: Entering directory `/home/Yves/jack_fst-1.2' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/opt/gnome/include/gtk-2.0 -I/opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/atk-1.0 -I/opt/gnome/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config -I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0-I/opt/gnome/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/vst -MT jfst.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/jfst.Tpo" \ -c -o jfst.o `test -f 'jfst.c' || echo './'`jfst.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/jfst.Tpo" ".deps/jfst.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/jfst.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from jfst.c:25: /usr/local/include/vst/aeffectx.h:918: error: parse error before "VstFileType" /usr/local/include/vst/aeffectx.h:939: error: parse error before '}' token jfst.c: In function `main': jfst.c:258: error: `JackThreadInitCallback' undeclared (first use in this function) jfst.c:258: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once jfst.c:258: error: for each function it appears in.) jfst.c:258: error: parse error before "jack_thread_init" make[1]: *** [jfst.o] Erreur 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Yves/jack_fst-1.2' make: *** [all] Erreur 2 I checked if the constructors where really removed in usr/local/include/vst/aeffectx.h ...yes they are. Could somebody tell me how to fix this please ? Thanks in advance,,,,and sorry for my Bad english, I'm french :)

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] ANN: [OT] Superkaramba "Borealis" theme v.2.5 released

by Ivica Ico Bukvic

Hi all, Although this is probably as OT as it gets, but what the heck, I decided to share my latest [non-musical] creation with the fellow LAU members as some of you may find this thingy [remotely] useful :-). I had a tough week so please be lenient with the flames :-) During the last couple of days I did some hacking on my Superkaramba low-cpu-footprint desktop eye-candy theme "Borealis" (association with the sound theme intentional) that provides bunch of useful system data as well as some additional toys and gizmos (although I presume that most of the hard core audio users on this list may very well avoid it in order to prevent wasting of precious CPU cycles). It's geared primarily towards KDE users and those of you who have a weak spot for the desktop eye-candy :-). So, without boring you any further, if interested please visit: http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=13876 Online docs at: http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/Linux/Borealis/Borealis_manual/index.html Comments and/or suggestions are most welcome and appreciated! Greets to all LAU's out there! Hope your week is/was better than mine! Best wishes, Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.795 / Virus Database: 539 - Release Date: 11/12/2004

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] midi and "sequencer" question

by Zachris Trolin

Hello all, I've got a question regarding MIDI and sequencing in linux. How can I record a "bulk dump" from a drum-machine/synth in Linux? I have tried Muse which just doesn't work, can't even specify what channel to listen to! I'm lost and it's really frustrating. MIDI isn't my strong side (or even interest) but I have been able to record both regular MIDI notes on a specified channel in Pro Tools on the Mac and also record a bulk-dump of all the settings. How to do it in linux? It should be basic stuff... Any tips and suggestions are very welcome /thanks z

19 years, 5 months

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev/user] RME is no more

by Mark Knecht

Jan, We sort of started working through some ideas last week some time. It would be expensive, but I don't think it would be anywhere near the number Ron talked about. Also, we were not talking about doing anything particularly commercial. Much like Ardour, Rosegarden, etc., are great apps but not necessarily marketable to the mass market, this card was envisioned by a few of us as something that starts to break the idea that you had to buy cards where you knew nothing about what was inside. All that said, there is no way that this device would be as cost effective as a commercially available device. The difference is that this community would actually have control over what a device like this does. My idea for a while has been to do a 1394-based device that uses some sort of Xilinx FPGA to implement most of the hardware. Possibly it might have a hardware mixer, zero-latency monitoring, etc., of possibly not. Beyond that it's pretty much A/D & D/A, possibly some digital I/Os like spdif or ADAT. Anyway, it's just an idea. Being that I recently find myself unemployed it seems like a way to pass some time until next year when I start looking for work again. (Although Apple is hiring now...) Anyway, I'm a bit old and out of touch with good tools. For this to be really interesting I think all the tools need to be Linux tools. I'm not even sure what's available for doing board design. As for internal software, if it was 1394-based then at a minimum we need a microcontroller to handle config ROM and general packet transmission/reception issues. We could certainly use someone with some experience in embedded and/or realtime software design. But again, this is mostly talk right now. I'm drawing a couple of block diagrams to sort of scope out what the parts list might look like. cheers, Mark On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:12:42 -0600, Jan Depner <eviltwin69(a)cableone.net> wrote: > Mark, > > I'd be really interested in this assuming there is some software > involved. I used to write real-time data acquisition systems for GPS > (early 80's when there were only 3 or 4 birds up). It just seems like > you'd need three or four prototypes for testing. I'd think the money > requirements would be prohibitive. > > Jan > > > > On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 09:24, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Hi, > > I haven't read anything except this thread. I don't pretend to know > > what it really means. My understanding of RME's support for Linux was > > only that they provided some technical info. That info was then used > > by Alsa developers to do the drivers. RME did not actually develop or > > support any of the Alsa drivers TTBOMK. (They were 'supportive'.) > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > That said, I'm on vacation this week, but still interested in the > > Open Source hardware sound card solution many of us spoke about in an > > earlier thread on this list. (I think it was this list...) > > > > Creating something ourselves is a path to freedom and continued > > support from the community. > > > > with best regards, > > Mark > > > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:47:57 +0100, Marek Peteraj <marpet(a)naex.sk> wrote: > > > I forgot, this is the product i'm talking about: > > > > > > http://www.rme-audio.de/firewire/ff800.htm > > > > > > Marek > > > > > > > >

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] trying to get midi working to run rosegarden

by airplays55＠yahoo.com

I've been trying to get rosegarden v2.1 working on knoppix HD install (to ultimately be remastered to my custom liveCD). The Knoppix liveCD autoconfigures almost everything automatically (video, network card, soundcard audio) but not the soundcard MIDI portion. I believe knoppix is using the OSS driver to be able to run rosegarden 2.1 By booting with the ALSA cheatcode, knoppix liveCD supposedly boots up using the ALSA drivers. The problem is that I've not found anyone that got rosegarden working with the midiports, whether using ALSA or OSS. Since I'm experimenting with a harddisk install however, I will be able to install any missing libraries & modules. However in looking at the rosegarden4 tutorial ch.2, I dont know where to begin since a lot of the ALSA modules are not installed, however hopefully I wouldnt need ALSA if I can get midi working under OSS for rosegarden 2.1? I'm not sure where to begin since rosegarden v2.1 says /dev/sequencer is invalid. Can somebody please offer a suggestion of a starting point to help get me on the track to troubleshoot and get rosegarden working? thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] [OT] any gimp maestros here ?

by Dave Phillips

Greetings: I need to work on some graphics for an article, and I'd like to know if it's possible to do some specific things with the GIMP. If you can help, please reply off-list, it's pretty much off-topic stuff. Best, dp

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] Terratec Aureon 5.1 USB mic input trouble

by Peter Brinkmann

Hello, I recently bought a Terratec Aureon 5.1 USB soundcard for my Dell Latitude C640, running an up-to-date installation of Fedora Core 3 as well as Demudi 1.2. I managed to get the soundcard to work with the software I care about (e.g., jack, rezound, ogle, mplayer) by making it the default soundcard for ALSA, hacking configuration files like .oglerc, and experimenting with alsamixer. There's one remaining problem, though. The input levels from the microphone and line in are extremely low. I've sort of managed to record from line in, but the input was very faint. When recording from the microphone, I can hear (and record) a little spike when switching the mic on, but nothing else. (The mic works fine when attached to the onboard soundcard.) Since I am getting some sort of input, I'm fairly sure that I haven't muted any of the pertinent channels, but so far I haven't been able to increase the input to acceptable levels. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Peter

19 years, 5 months

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more

by Marek Peteraj

> > I assume that RME has developped their own protocols, which they don't > want to share. And frankly I can understand their point of view, because > I think an awfull lot of time (=money) must have been spent to develop > an efficient protocol. 1. So they haven't invested the a comparable amount of time into Hammerfall series? 2. I can only understand the point of view of open source developers here, since they also invested an awfull lot of time (and money that they didn't get back!) into developing linux audio applications, many of which are state-of-art at least with respect to technology. And they're free as in beer/speech. That said i really don't understand the point of view of those few how actually kindof defend the position of RME (or any other manufacturer in a similar position), no offense intended. > The RME story also goes for the firewire interface of M-Audio. They use > a DM1000 based platform, so initially we thought the device could be > supported by FreeBob. But apparently they modified the reference > firmware, making it (possibly) non-conformant to the 1394TA specs. As > such these devices cannot be supported by FreeBob directly. Maybe if we > have a working driver, we can convince the M-Audio people to share the > nescessary info so that we can support their devices also. Which seems like it's the beginning of end for linux pro-audio hw support if we don't fight for it. Right now it concerns just me, but it might concern everyone in the near future. Marek

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] announce: Instrument Tuner: fmit 0.9.4

by Gilles Degottex

Hi, everything is in the title :) * better frequency recognition with an interpolation of the wave length * many bug fixes project website: https://gna.org/projects/fmit last version: http://download.gna.org/fmit/fmit-0.9.4.tar.bz2 Enjoy, Gilles

19 years, 5 months

[linux-audio-user] Re: linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 14, Issue 81

by Brian Redfern

As long as they don't wind up phasing out the PCMCIA cards in the near future and go all firewire. Also a person could theoretically build USB audio devices that just strictly follow the USB standard, and they should work on linux, mac and windows the same, Edirol seems to be perhaps the best bet for future audio support simply because they strictly follow the USB audio standard. If maudio is allowed to keep supporting linux and RME keeps making the PCMCIA and PCI based systems then there's really no problem at all. On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu wrote: > Send linux-audio-user mailing list submissions to > linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > linux-audio-user-owner(a)music.columbia.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of linux-audio-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more (Georg Rudolph) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:36:48 +0100 > From: Georg Rudolph <georg.rudolph(a)schwaben.de> > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more > To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu> > Message-ID: <41A777C0.2090400(a)schwaben.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Please, let's not be too harsh. I recently bought the pcmcia based > multiface from RME, only because it has linux support, and it works > great, on both kernels. Of course, firewire is cooler, but there is this > way out. Glad that I didn't wait, at least. Firewire needs more time to > be more legacy, hopefully not too long :) > > Regards, > Georg. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > linux-audio-user mailing list > linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu > http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > End of linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 14, Issue 81 > ************************************************ >

19 years, 5 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
19
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user November 2004