Hi,
I've begun working alot more with LADSPA plugins and
have found it very easy to achieve satisfying results.
www.iaxs.net/~rparker/legaladvice.ogg
Despite the relative ease with which my partners Bill,
Dana and I were able to achieve our final product,
legaladvice.ogg, the real acid test is whether or not
anyone thinks the final product is effective. Give it
a listen and let me know what you think.
A JK Audio RemoteMix3, phone dialer with audio i/o, is
used to build a mix minus. I imagine you can google
for that.
We run a Neumann M 147 tube mic into an Avalon Vt
737sp which inserts into a channel on the Tascam
DM-24. We send that channel direct (it's not assigned
to the DM-24 stereo buss) to Ardour where Barry's
Satan Maximizer and the Steve Harris AM-Pitchshift are
inserted pre-fader. The effected return from Ardour
routes back to the RemoteMix3 via an Aux bus
(DAC/analog send) from a new DM-24 channel that is not
assigned to stereo buss.
That pitchshifted/maximized Aux send replaces my
telephone and is mixed into a conversation with
another caller in the RemoteMix3. The RemoteMix3
analog output routes to the DM-24 in a channel that is
assigned to the stereo bus where we finally get to
monitor it.
A wireless lav would have enabled us to wonder around
the studio while monitoring phone conversations on the
Alesis M1 Active monitors. Definitely a bonus for the
multitasking professional that doesn't want to be
restricted to a single task because of some stupid
wire.
ron
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Juhana recently posted:
(A) Someone who makes great songs with commercial synths should
replace the synth track with a track made with an open source synths.
For the demo purposes only.
(B) Someone could create a MIDI file which plays great with
commercial synths. The output should be recorded for us.
Then we try to create the same with open source synths, possibly
improving the software at the same time.
--------------
While at first I thought: "I don't want to do this, but I'd like to hear
the results." But when Flo responded so negatively, I began to examine
my own reaction.
This is a good idea. All of the synth manufacturers that I'm aware of create
numerous tunes to show off the synth. It would be nice to have something
that allows one to compare sounds between synths as well. These demo tunes
usually show off advanced features of the synth, whereas sometimes all I
want is to hear a simple phrase. The Roland XV-3080 has a function wherein
by merely pressing in the volume knob, a phrase is generated so the user
can hear the tone (patch, instrument, performance, combination, etc.).
I use this function all the time to simply hear the difference between patches
and performances. It doesn't always work well, but it does help.
Now doing this will not be easy. The phrases chosen need to be chosen
based on the type of intrument and so on. For some instruments, it just
isn't possible to audition like this using MIDI files. But many synths
can do this. I'll probably start with variations of the Roland phrases.
I'll see what I can do to create a set of phrases for comparisions, then
ask that others add to it. If some sets of recordings could be posted
for popular synths, then users (esp. newbies) could decide whether or not
it would be beneficial to try and install it or go elsewhere.
Now I fully realize that one needs to hear tones in context and all that,
but surely people would admit to using audition functions for comparisons.
And it's possible to create audition phrases WITH context, too.
Thanks for that suggestion Juhana. I have my own instrument-creation
programs and will probably find audition phrases more useful than my
mere hacking on the keyboard.
Regards to all,
Dave.
OK, I've never done wireless with Linux before, and (surprise) it's
apparently a baffling ordeal, as lots of common devices aren't
supported!
All I need to know is "does the Linksys WUSB 54G work OOTB". IOW
configure the kernel source, make, make install and no f*ing with out of
tree drivers.
TIA,
Lee
Hi
As a new om user I'm concerned about the speed/effeciency of the various
ladspa plugins. Is there a tool that will do benchmark tests on ladspa
plugins?
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
Lee Revell posted:
Wrong, obviously, the future of Linux music production is using native
Linux audio applications under Linux.
----------------------
Assuming that Linux music production actually has a future, one would
hope that this would be the case. Meanwhile:
As a demonstration of what can be done right now, here's something I did today
entirely with entry-level *Windows software running under WINE*, no plugins
involved (so I guess it's slightly off-topic), and *not* including CompMuzys:
http://home.earthlink.net/~davidrclark/linux_audio_users/slow_rock.ogg
Composition/edit -> MIDI edit and arrange -> Mix -> one-button record ->
WAV file. (Then Linux oggenc for publishing.) External synth. About
90 minutes total.
I believe that this is a realistic scenario for a music production person
in a hurry at a TV station, for example --- beyond the work process involved
with merely recording a guitar for a minute or two, but not CD production.
Who knows what else those WINE guys might make happen?
Note: I did *not* use my Green's-function 3-D audio programs on this, so the
reverb doesn't sound like my normal stuff with headphones, in case anyone
notices.
Regards to all,
Dave.
Hi
I'm looking for a mixer app that:
* works with alsa/jack
* has multiple inputs, and (at least) stereo out
* will let me load a "mix", change it from a hardware controller, and
save the modified "mix"
It would be nice with some sort of gui and a way to name the tracks.
What I'd like to do is route the output of variuos softsynths to one
app. This is done from a script, with one script per song. So if I find
that one sound is a bit too low or something, I reach for a knob adjust
the volume and save the "mix" so it's there next time I run the script...
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
Paul Davis,
You recently posted:
i find it amusing that people think hard, difficult work like running
shared libraries from *another operating system* should somehow just
happen.
I myself was floored when it all worked. That's why I posted
this information (again). Personally I look at this as an existence
proof of something I didn't think was possible --- certainly not through
mere installation. I can't even get my own stuff to work this well.
Regards,
Dave.
Just wondering what the preferred "linux band in a box" is for learning
jazz tunes. My criteria would be ability to handle complex chord symbols
precisely and preferable light weight so I can run it on an old p3 600
lappy.
Thanks
Iain
Hey,
I noticed that Ubuntu has an unclaimed bounty to reengineer a bunch of
the sound events for the Breezy release. I figured if there's anyone
who'd want to (get paid to) do this, they'd be on this list.
It's a fairly detailed spec, I bet someone could do it in a day.
http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/SoundEvents
Lee