Greetings,
I've just received a notice from the Linux Journal that they will no
longer be running my monthly articles. I know that some people on this
list have enjoyed reading them, but alas, all things must end. I've been
invited to contribute full-length articles to the digital edition, which
I will do, but those articles will be available only to subscribers.
I have given some thought to collecting all my LJ articles to date (12+
years worth) and posting updated versions at linux-sound.org. However,
the work is non-trivial - it takes considerable time to research and
write those articles - and I have bills to pay. Other work for hire will
necessarily take precedence, meaning I'll probably teach more and
perform more often.
So, I hope you've enjoyed my work for LJ. Thanks for the reads, I've
enjoyed the writing.
Best,
dp
I am only one individual with a tiny Internet presence, but on Wednesday my
website will consist of a single page with a message about SOPA and PIPA
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Hello,
Any idea to quickly preview audio files (using jack)? I have a huge
sample library (.wav mostly) and I'd love something like a file
browser that previews files when you click them or hover them. Is
there such a thing? Even if i have to open a more complex audio
application and just use its file browser i'd be ok with that
solution.
Hey guys!
Some months ago (a year ago, maybe) I asked on the LAD list if anyoe could
JACKify paulstretch. Someone was kind enough to do it and the change was
indeed incorporated into the main source. Did anyone actually compile new
JACKified paulstretch for Ubuntu 10.04?
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
On 01/19/2012 12:44 PM, linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org wrote:
> reetings,
>>
>> I've just received a notice from the Linux Journal that they will no
>> longer be running my monthly articles. I know that some people on this list
>> have enjoyed reading them, but alas, all things must end. I've been invited
>> to contribute full-length articles to the digital edition, which I will do,
>> but those articles will be available only to subscribers.
>>
>> I have given some thought to collecting all my LJ articles to date (12+
>> years worth) and posting updated versions at linux-sound.org. However,
>> the work is non-trivial - it takes considerable time to research and write
>> those articles - and I have bills to pay. Other work for hire will
>> necessarily take precedence, meaning I'll probably teach more and perform
>> more often.
>>
>> So, I hope you've enjoyed my work for LJ. Thanks for the reads, I've
>> enjoyed the writing.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> dp
As I told you during our 'planned meeting' in the train to Maynooth ;),
your articles where the best resources to get started and familiar with
Linuxaudio. You helped me find my way and many others!
Thanks a lot for your writings, sad that it will end
(A big loss for the Linuxaudio community when it comes to knowledge and
'buzz').
Dirk
Hello all. I'm new to the list, although I shouldn't be. I've been
running a Linux-based recording studio now for 10 years, and doing it
professionally for 3. I use ardour, hydrogen, muse2, mixbus, LinuxDSP, and
a bunch of OSS LADSPA and LV2 plugins.
I recently decided to jump into the RME arena (currently using an Echo
Audiofire12 for my converters and interface, and it works beautifully) and
am finding it oddly difficult to get good results from google concerning
the state of new-ish RME products and Linux compatibility.
Has anyone out there used the Raydat interface successfully with the WCM
(word clock module) add-on card? Does the hdspmixer work with the raydat?
Are there any shortcomings, or any reason I shouldn't use it in a
professional studio?
I thought it'd be a good idea to refresh the internet new RME info, because
the latest update I can find is from September of 2011.
Any info is welcome!
Thank you!
--Jason
www.advancedbudgetstudios.com
Hi, I'm interested in how to create a "choir" effect - given a single
instrument playing (I'm personally interested in single drum shots from
hydrogen and guitar lines, i.e. not chords), I'd like to have n
copies of the signal (where n would probably be something between 2 and
20), each with a slightly different delay, volume, eq, pitch.
Is this doable in a sane way, at least in part, with the free tools we
have? I think it should be doable in sc or pd, but I was wondering if
it's possible with ladspa, lv2 and dssi, and maybe a host like ams or
ingen.
cheers,
renato
QasTools version 0.17.0 is available.
QasTools is a collection of dektop applications for ALSA.
Changes:
* all: setting names for state save/restore changed/regrouped
* all: smart main window sizeHint() to get a useable window
size after leaving fullscreen
* all: new common info dialog - uses QListView page
selection intead of tabs
* shared: device selection style tweaks: selected item
now emphasized by a thin frame
* shared: device selection style tweaks: Rounded selection area
* shared: use QSplitter instead of QDockwidget for device selection
view. It couldn't be detached anyway and size restoring
works more reliable.
* qasconfig: settings directory changed to shared ~/.config/qastools/
(was ~/.config/qasconfig/)
* qasconfig: new basic command line options (--version, --help, etc.)
* qashctl: new basic command line options (--version, --help, etc.)
* qasmixer: new application icon
Homepage with more information
http://xwmw.org/qastools
Project page
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qastools/
Happy volume changing!
-- Sebastian Holtermann