I realize this isn't strictly a *Linux* audio question, but my question is actually platform-independent. I've recently realized that if I want to keep doing my vinyl to AIFF project on my new MacBook Air (running Yosemite), that Audacity doesn't officially support Yosemite.
Does anyone else use both? Or (for whatever reason) has anyone else had reason to have to migrate from Audacity to SoX?
(I admit one issue I have yet to even explore before installing SoX, is whether I can even use the headphone jack for analog input, or will I have to get an analog to USB converter?)
Thanks in advance, if anyone has thoughts.
-Mark (longtime absentee, now lurker)
Hi all,
i wonder if I can redirect audio from my android mobile phone to a jack
server (preferably) or pulse audio server (not so preferably) through wifi,
in much the same way this can be done through bluetooth.
So I already have a jack server running and the easiest would seem to have
jack running on my android and acting as a jack client, to send audio
channels to a jackd server that is connected with m home audio system.
I am willing to consider any preposition that involved using wifi for the
audio routing, rather than bluetooth.
Thanks!
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:18:35 +0100
> From: sub <subvertao(a)inventati.org>
> Message-ID: <54EF475B.8040601(a)inventati.org>
> i received a mail from the band in which they tell me
> that the mix is faster and at a higher pitch than the
> audio they recorded through a video camera at the
> concert.
Video cameras record at 48k rate, so someone will need to rate convert.
Either the camera audio will need to be converted to 44.1k or your audio
will need to be converted to 48k.
Which you choose probably does not matter, but everyone involved needs to
know and agree on the chosen project sample rate.
If the final output will be a video then converting every thing to 48k is
probably the easiest choice. If the final output will be a CD (or audio
only files) then probably 44.1k is the easiest choice. If you will have
both a video and audio only files, my choice would be working in 48k and
then sample rate convert the final mix to 44.1k for CD.
--
Chris Caudle
I have been trying to strategize cutting the USB cord (right now, one USB, one Firewire...) for my portable synth on and off for a long time; I really don't like wearing out USB ports and cables !!!! Was just perusing some of the AoIP conversation and thinking...and then a thought was given, did a search, and found:
https://www.hifiberry.com/
So, at least in theory, for about $160 or so, I could get one of those and an RPi 2.0 starter kit, run netjack and qmidinet, and have a 96kHz wifi audio interface with MIDI...? Anyone see an obvious catch?
--
Jonathan E. Brickman | jeb(a)ponderworthy.com | (785)233-9977
Ponderworthy | http://ponderworthy.com
Music of compassion; fire, and life!!!
I have been reading a manual for an AoIP (ravenna) SW sound card. There is
a very interesting comparison between a Mac and a win-pc.
This is not a special card, just a standard GB ethernet card connected to
a Ravenna i/o box (Horus).
Windows:
48K = 64 i/o
96k = 32 i/o
192 = 16 i/o
384 = 8 i/o
latency:
64 samples - not recomended
128 - ok - but not default
256 -recomended
At 192k, smaller buffer sizes are ok, but 64 is minimum (like jack
at 32/2)
Mac:
64 i/o at all sample rates
latency 32/48/64 (defaults to 32)
Is this the hw or the os? the mac gui shows if the computer is running ptp
or not, but the windows one doesn't. maybe that is the difference.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net