14 Oct
2010
14 Oct
'10
8:55 a.m.
On 10/14/10 06:56, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
fons(a)kokkinizita.net wrote:
It's a logical choice given the fact that there are not too many proper
formats for big blobs. I came to the same conclusion a few years ago and
used it ever since.
Funny that some of Apple's own programs didn't seem to support CAF with
all it's features. I remember one time giving a ~70GB recording to an
external studio for mixing and Logic couldn't open a 32 tracks float
format CAF. Luckily they had Audacity installed and extracted all tracks
manually - which took them 2h of paid studio time.. ..a bill I would
really like to send to Apple.
Flo
--
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4 x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
I'm not really in love with RF64. For my own
multichannel use I've
standardized on CAF - clean format, no 4GB problems, and all apps
using your library can read it.
Thats an interesting choice.