25 Sep
2011
25 Sep
'11
10:41 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
hint: the patch to add a new port type to JACK will
involve on the
same order of magnitude number of characters as have already been used
in this email thread.
Indeed. But why should anyone submit a patch for an idea that
has already been rejected, in particular if the rejection was
motivated in a way that implicitly condones crappy programming
instead of criticizing it ? What sort of excellence can you
expect if things are decided in that way ? (1)
Don't take this personally, but I've had enough of this sort
of negative argumentation for some time. I do remember the LV2
discussions (2), the Jack session ones, and some others. And
the result is that I go my own way, even if that leads to a
loss of synergy and benefit for all.
(1) Mediocrity.
(2) The real gem in that case was a remark that representing
the sample rate as a ratio would lead to inefficiency as it
required a (1, one) division.
Ciao,
--
FA