16 Aug
2006
16 Aug
'06
4:29 p.m.
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 14:21 -0400, Rob wrote:
On Wed August 16 2006 14:07, Lee Revell wrote:
Well, I happen to think the law is correct and logical in this case. My
creations are my property, and I should have the same right to make a
living by selling them as a sculptor or a baker or a carpenter does.
Copying my creations without my permission denies me the right to make a
living by selling my creations, in exactly the same way that theft
deprives a maker of physical objects of that right.
Lee
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 13:59 -0400, Rob wrote:
You were discussing logic, not law. Huge difference.
On Wed August 16 2006 13:16, Lee Revell wrote:
Copyright law says otherwise. > Expecting every artist to get permission
before they
> create their art is just plain idiocy.
By your logic, it's OK to steal material from a
construction site if you're using it to create art.
Be accurate. By that
logic it's okay to take pictures of
material on a construction site if he's using them to create
art.