29 Mar
2005
29 Mar
'05
3:32 p.m.
> Wait
now, you're the one that thought it
would
be a good
idea to add
meterbridge to JAMin.
Really? I have no recollection of suggesting that if I did am clueless as to the context within
which I
would have cast that vote.
Someone said that they were using meterbridge and
another app to
monitor inputs to JAMin and they thought it would be
a good thing if
they were included in JAMin. You replied that you
agreed. I don't
remember what list it was on but I'm sure I could
find it. I think it
might have been Joern's first post on the DC offset
problem. Besides all
that, what does meterbridge have to do
with my reply?
You were complaining about too many things being
included in JAMin.
I was just pointing out that you also want more
things in JAMin. You just
posted that
being
yesterday.
For meterbride? I don't think so but am open to proven wrong.
Actually, when I
> use JAMin I often find myself needing just one
more
parametric EQ.
I don't need more equalization control in JAMin often process the source to prepare it for
mastering.
I agree but many times I don't have anything but
the stereo inputs.
I'm doing mastering for other people. If I'm mixing
or recording I'll
adjust at the source.
And in my experience that is the correct method.
> Granted, I can draw any curve I want and get the
> same effect but I can't
> slide it to exactly the right place. There are
> still a couple of
> features that would be nice in JAMin. Direct
out to
> .wav files has been
> mentioned a number of times. In fact I think
you're
one of
the
proponents of that.
I'm not against it because it doesn't affect audio
processing.
Steve wants to add warning
lights for DC offset.
And my response stated that I think Joern's is good one. So I don't understand your
point.
> I'd like to have small delays available for low
and
mid band.
That affects the processing of audio and now that
you're forcing the issue I will go on the record
saying I don't know if it's a good idea. My leave me doubtful.
How can it effect the audio if it's set to 0 by
default? Also, it
is useful for mastering. I'm thinking about putting
it somewhere out of
the way so that if you don't want to use it it will
be off by default.
Your first proposal included links to
documentation
that explained the idea. I took the time to read
those
documents. I simply wasn't convinced and
didn't
reply.
I figured no response was the lowest volume vote
that
I could cast and wanted to keep the tension
between
you and I somewhat tempered.
It's
> still a mastering tool and we haven't added
anything
that is
not useful
for mastering.
I know you feel very strongly about this feature am skeptical.
At the moment I'm having to run externally
through my BBE to get the
delays set the way I want them. I don't like having
to go
digital->analog->digital just to get a couple of per
band delays.
Jan
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype.
Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jamin-devel mailing list
Jamin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamin-devel