Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: guitar amp emulation

Is there an easy way to add new impulse responses to cabinetII? I have a couple of responses from POD XT found on the jesusonic website. (Dunno about copyright) http://www.jesusonic.com/preset.php?pid=6 jack_convolve would do fine. But what about CabinetII? I know CabinetII doesn't use regular FFT convolve. But you can "convert" the responses to work with cabinetII right?

2007/3/7, Cesare Marilungo <cesare(a)poeticstudios.com>om>: >Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: >> Julien Claassen escribe: >> >>> Have heard both POD and VAmp. I liked them both, they are great >pieces of >>> hardware. Thought about getting a POD myself, for processing analogue >>> leadsounds. >>> >> >> I love how the POD sounds. Their simple delay patches sound a lot like >> U2 and you don't have to spend your fee for a vintage Korg digital >> delay unit. And cabinet simulations are also lovely. Very worth how >> much it costs. >> >> Regarding Behringer, they're ok doing outboard but not so ok regarding >> creative equipment. I own a Marshall JTM amp and obviously I'd never >> spend a buck in a Behringer amp. >> >> Cordially, Ismael >> >I own a Zoom G2.1u: > >http://www.cesaremarilungo.com/download/music/Hope.ogg > >You can hear it on this track of mine (the guitar is a Fender >Stratocaster standard): > >http://www.cesaremarilungo.com/download/music/Hope.ogg >http://www.cesaremarilungo.com/download/music/Hope.mp3 >http://www.cesaremarilungo.com/download/music/Hope.flac > >It's very good for the money, IMO. And you can use it as an audio card, >too, via USB, altought at 44.1Khz /16bit (works on linux). Otherwise, >the ADC / DAC are 96Khz / 24bit. > >The only thing that I miss is the ability to save/edit patches via pc, >but the unit is very easy to program. > >c. > >-- >http://www.cesaremarilungo.com > >