26 Jun
2011
26 Jun
'11
9:36 p.m.
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:23:28 -0400
Joe Hartley <jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:06:40 +0200
rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I rather think OpenBox achieved what it set out to do - be a fast, light,
highly configurable window manager - so apart from bug fixes what development
would be needed?
I find it ideal.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
On 06/26/2011 02:54 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Fluxbox is Openbox's successor and is still in very active development.
I like it a lot and use it on all my machines, not just the studio
machine. I've never had a problem running either gnome or kde apps
under it.
The downside for OpenBox (not xmonad) is that it
seems not very
actively developed in the last year or so, not much releases or even
git commits.
You could try Fluxbox instead. That project is still pretty active
afaik.