9 Apr
2007
9 Apr
'07
6:31 p.m.
David Baron wrote:
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
A musician (or any artist) using his or her talents in a vulgar manner
has nothing to do with whether or not their talents are with us today.
Earnest Hemingway isn't with us today, because he shot himself. Did he
use his talent in a vulgar way?
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
On 4/8/07, David Baron <d_baron(a)012.net.il>
wrote:
Must have been cool!
So am I, sort of. Grew up in the 60s. Woodstock.
The whole hippie scene.
I loved Hendricks, though I was more a "folkie". He and all the others
that took tremendous talent and used it for vulgar (and narcotic) things
all ended the same. What a tremendous and horrid pity. What a waste.
Enjoy Zappa. This does not mean using cheap or foul language in a public
forum about Linux and music which has members of all ideas and
backgrounds, does it?
I was actually not thinking of Zappa's music (you must
know that he
was narcotic-free). I was thinking of some of his publicly broadcast
arguments with do-gooders during the Tipper fiasco. Even face-to-face
he let them have it. You misspell Hendrix and call him vulgar. lol
thanks for your opinion.
I did not call Hendrix (yes, spelling counts) vulgar. I
said that many great
talents used their talent in a vulgar manner and the consequences were in
fact that we no longer have the talents with us today.