Re: [linux-audio-user] is ext3 ok for real-time / low-latency?

On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:00:26PM +0000, anton wrote: There's no reason not to. I've used Reiserfs on my workstation since last 1999. The only filesystem I lost in that time was due to my stupidity (I forgot to apply a VFS fix for the VFS-eats-filesystems bug that was in 2.4.5. I knew about the bug, I knew about the patch. I was stupid). ext3 has been shown to have more variance in the latency than other filesystems. Perhaps this is an issue for you. I've used Reiserfs and ext3 on small personal disks, up to many-drived RAID arrays at work. I use Reiserfs whenever I'm building the system up from scratch because it's faster for streaming operations and deletes. I use ext3 whenever I have to convert a filesystem for journalling because I don't have to backup and restore. There's really very little reliability difference between the two. -- Ross Vandegrift ross(a)willow.seitz.com A Pope has a Water Cannon. It is a Water Cannon. He fires Holy-Water from it. It is a Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses it. It is a Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses the Hell out of it. It is a Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He has it pierced. It is a Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He makes it official. It is a Canon Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. Batman and Robin arrive. He shoots them.