11 Sep
2004
11 Sep
'04
1:21 a.m.
On Friday 10 September 2004 04:25 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 14:57, John Check wrote:
Sweet!
On Thursday 09 September 2004 04:20 pm, Lee
Revell wrote:
Exactly, but realtime-lsm has not changed in a long time, it's very
simple (~200 lines of code), has no known bugs, and many people find it
useful. So it's a perfect candidate to include in the kernel.
I have already received an OK from the maintainer, as soon as I get a
patch from him I will be posting it to LKML.
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 14:24, David Baron wrote:
Are you sure? ALSA isn't always current. On Thursday 09 September 2004 19:00,
linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu wrote:
> Go for it. i would definetly like to save the extra step of
> compiling the realtime lsm each time i upgrade my kernel.. And i
> think it might prove useful even for non audio users.. Often
> security stuff likes to mlock small portions of memory, too, etc..
Yes, except that the realtime-lsm precompiled binary is not updated
on Sid each time the kernel is. The only way to keep it current is to
compile it yourself. Compiles quickly and reliably--just remember to
copy the .ko to the correct place and then reboot.
This is why we want realtime-lsm to be part of the kernel, because it
_would_ automatically get upgraded when you upgraded your kernel.
Since Lee