22 Dec
2002
22 Dec
'02
10:46 a.m.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 06:31:26AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
(cut)
However, I think that this isn't where you want to
be anyway, since
you're not interested in distributing copyrighted loops. (Right?)
(cut)
Good point.
Maybe we should only serve loops that fall under
a usable creative commons license
[http://www.creativecommons.org/].
Its not interesting to serve loops on which
the original owner wants to exercise copyright
on anyway, because then its not exactly an
open loop library anymore.
v