25 Sep
2011
25 Sep
'11
10:44 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Paul Davis
wrote:
it wasn't rejected.
hint: the patch to add a new port type to JACK
will involve on the
same order of magnitude number of characters as have already been used
in this email thread.
Indeed. But why should anyone submit a patch for an idea that
has already been rejected, in particular if the rejection was
motivated in a way that implicitly condones crappy programming
instead of criticizing it ? What sort of excellence can you
expect if things are decided in that way ? (1) Don't take this personally, but I've had
enough of this sort
of negative argumentation for some time. I do remember the LV2
discussions (2), the Jack session ones, and some others. And
the result is that I go my own way, even if that leads to a
loss of synergy and benefit for all.
fair enough.