15 Oct
2016
15 Oct
'16
3:47 p.m.
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:38:23 +0000
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:07:46PM -0400, jonetsu
wrote:
What is amusing is how this can be distorted. Speak about
processing. But this is interesting, this reaction.
It's really up to the individual, really.
Some, it seems, can get
easily influenced to become lazy.
(Ralf)
... in case the audio engineer should be unable
to distinguish
a vocal track from a guitar track ...
That probably describes the target audience for this sort of
thing rather well.
IMHO an 'audio engineer' adding this sort of processing (EQ +
compressor + mutiband compressor + exciter) to a vocal track
after having listened to it for 10 seconds is showing his/her
incompetence rather clearly. (Ralf)
> ... in case the audio engineer should be unable to distinguish
> a vocal track from a guitar track ...
And so on for any other machine that can detect something automatically
in every day life: the user is a moron. An automatic transmission
would be one example.
So if there is any kind of audio analysis going on, then it means that
the "audio engineer" is actually really caught between apostrophes.
Any type of analysis, whether or not this analysis includes identifying
an instrument.
It would be an interesting experiment to record the
result to
a new track and let the 'track assistant' decide again. And
again, and again. Could be amusing.
What's the point ? Just like a human. How many mixes can you do of a
set of track. Unless that human thinks he's perfect, of course. In
wither case it is amusing.
(Ralf)
What do you try to archive?
A discussion maybe ?
But we got it after all, isn't it.