M P Smoak wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 11:50 pm, david wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> david wrote:
>>> carmen wrote:
>>>> On Fri Mar 09, 2007 at 07:43:00PM -1000, david wrote:
>>>>> ljc(a)internet.com.uy wrote:
>>>>>> hello list, i intend to buy a new laptop, and i'm undecided
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>> if Apple is selling a notebook for $1099 and HP is selling the
>>>> same thing for $599, i'd get the HP - call me crazy
>>> HP is NOT selling the same quality as Apple. You get what you pay
>>> for.
>> If you're in the habit of occasionally challenging your
>> preconceptions do this little experiment: Visit Dell, just for
>> convenience - or pick another if you wish, and configure a laptop
>> with the same features and specs as a MacBook Pro - ignore the
>> elegance of the OS and its heart of BSD...even ignore the
>> simplicity and speed with which it runs multiple GNU/Linux distros
>> in nothing more difficult or risky than a simple file constituting
>> a Parallels Desktop VM, and get back to us with either a
>> verification of your comparison factor or a new-found appreciation
>> for the value of opinions based upon verifiable facts.
> My opinion of HP/Compaq is based on my verifiable experience with
> them. Not a preconception.
>
> My experience with Dell - having spent 11 years on a corporate Help
> Desk during the time the corporation switched from IBM Thinkpads to
> Dell laptops - is also based on facts. The number of hardware
> problems reported to the help desk for Dell laptops was five times
> higher than we had reported for the IBM laptops. Even OLD Thinkpads
> had fewer problem reports than NEW Dell laptops.
>
> That may have changed since IBM is no longer the quality determiner
> for their old brand.
[snips]
For now I'll take an "old, outdated
system" that works for me rather
than the latest, greatest.
I'm a bottom feeder when it comes to budget, so anything new I buy is
"old" technology! ;-)
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community