24 Apr
2004
24 Apr
'04
3:55 p.m.
Tim Blechmann <TimBlechmann(a)gmx.net> writes:
i had a look at impd, yesterday ... i haven't been
able to use it (work
in progress), but i'll definitely have a look at it again, when it's
done ...
It may take a while :)
and i'm willing to try to merge the dsp changes
between the
devel and the impd branch ...
cool :) May I tell Mathieu about it? :)
what i criticize is not _what_ mathieu is doing, but
that there is no
roadmap where pd should go. mathieu set up his own roadmap, but probably
his impd and millers future stable releases will go to different
directions ...
there is too little communication between the pd developers ...
I agree and it seems that this was the case from the beginning (I
started using pd at around version .29). But there seems to be a lot of
uncertainty about directions among the developers, although I have not
really seen any vigurous disagreements... perhaps it's just lack of
any clear future goals? I know I seem to be taking
impd's side but I'm not really hooked on it yet. I would just give
mathieu a point for the initiative and action in moving towards the
realisation.
Ok, I think we've move sufficiently off-topic here... Sorry.
--
_
__ __ (_)___ Michal Seta
/ \/ \ _/^ _|
/ V |_ \ @creazone.32k.org
(___/V\___|_|___/
http://www.[creazone]|[noonereceiving].32k.org