28 Sep
2004
28 Sep
'04
11:54 a.m.
brad stafford wrote:
I just tonight switched from the Planet CCRMA RH9 to
FC1. The install
was purely from the CDROMs dated 4/25/2004.
I've seen all the latest posts about interrupts and did the required
reading on the internet. I really managed to get RH9 cleaned up but in
FC1 I'm seeing something a little different. I have a Delta 1010 and I'm
running an AMD Barton 2.6 with 5 PCI slots. The question is what the
heck are IRQ 16 and 22? I moved the sound and ethernet cards around to
get them to 16 and 22 as they used to be eth0 on 21 and ICE1712 on 22. I
have ACPI turned off as a service but don't have a "disable" option in
the BIOS. I did turn off USB support in the BIOS.
Is 16 like the equivalent of IRQ 3 since it's following 15?
[brad@mars brad]$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 81690 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 75 IO-APIC-edge keyboard
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
8: 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
12: 836 IO-APIC-edge PS/2 Mouse
14: 10789 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 735 IO-APIC-edge ide1
16: 0 IO-APIC-level ICE1712
22: 21 IO-APIC-level eth0
NMI: 0
LOC: 81633
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
I'm getting 5.8 msec latency in JACK with 128 frames/period at 44100 and
2 periods/buffer. A huge improvement over the 46.1 msec using RH9 with
capabilities.
Thanks, Brad.
Brad,
First I see no reason for you to change anything. If there's no
problem to fix, then why make a problem?
Interrupts, in your case, are based on the APIC model. You machine
has an APIC (Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller) as well as one
or more IO-APIC chips, so it supports more than the old style 15
interrupts. This is not a problem. It should be an advantage, if
everything is set up correctly.
My input would be to go with the flow. If one of these days you find
that you are getting worse performance, be it xruns or something else,
then come back and let's look at the setup of the machine. Until then,
be happy. It looks like the results are quite good, right?!?
Cheers,
Mark