22 Mar
2007
22 Mar
'07
1:27 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:36:43AM +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:08:53AM -0700, Bob van der
Poel wrote:
Indeed. All my stuff is Creative Commons licensed, and I am definitely not alone. There is
a huge wealth of material out there with CC licenses, everything from music to mixes
(ccmixter.org) to sound effects and field recordings (freesound archive) to photographs
(Flickr.com has a Creative Commons section), etc.
Professor Lessig of Creative Commons was inspired by the approach that Richard Stallman
and Eben Moglen took with the GPL, and it's very smart. You can't change a
horribly broken and deeply-entrenched system, but you *can* go off and create your own
better alternative to it.
Somewhat off-topic, but it's often struck me that only a LISP programmer would have
come up with the recursive hack that is the GPL. :-)
- -ken
If I can rant for a moment, I get quite annoyed
by the whole *music
business* which seems to screw artists, reward mediocrity, and promote
business models which evolved in a very different world. I'm just glad
(very glad) that I've been able to enjoy music as a passion over my life
and never needed it as income.
For now I'll just leave my songs up on my site. If I get a C&D I'll take
them down. No big deal to me either way. And, if I am technically
breaking a copyright, I'll sleep well knowing that I'm not hurting
anyone's income :)
Another way to combat the tide of irrational copyright attitudes is to
create your own original content/songs/whatever and then release them
under a license that frees people of the restrictions. If each one of
us does this it will slowly change things. The Creative Commons licenses
seem to be popping up in more and more places every day, for example.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGAhOUe8HF+6xeOIcRAkWcAJ4uQ6kX/vlQ0ljIg/2lLGSjR9DQxACgrwkU
jyEZyMaoeFWo1NR9N/auBFk=
=PkAq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----