10 Dec
2004
10 Dec
'04
7:12 a.m.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:59:54 +0100, MarC wrote
En/na Alexandre Prokoudine ha escrit:
mediawiki (http://wikipedia.sourceforge.net/) is the one that the wikipedia
uses, and looks the most flash and professional I think. It also deals with
all these registration and anti spamming issues I should think (not having
used it) this is important, otherwise you end up with wiki that looks like
this: http://projects.dorkbot.org/rd04/wiki/FrontPage
I also feel it's pertinent to shamelessly plug the pawfaliki at this point
too: http://www.pawfal.org/index.php?page=PawfalIki
cheers,
dave
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:19:58 +0100, MarC
<marc_contrib(a)ramonvinyes.es> wrote:
OK your opinion. I must say I have no personal reason to promote
TWiki. It's the first time I use it, but it has worked fine for me
to create the SoundCards page. Just to avoid some bad intepretations...
I just say all this because a person who is too lazy to register,
might also be too lazy to contribute and state his/her name in the page... I know many of you don't like registration but
I really think it is the
simplest way to avoid spam and graphities.
It will automatically decrease number of contributing people, no
matter how cool and sweet registration is itself.
Alexandre