22 Jun
2011
22 Jun
'11
2:32 p.m.
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:58 +0000,
linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org wrote:
Message: 28
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:04:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julien Claassen <julien(a)c-lab.de>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Text-based sound visualisation?
To: Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org>
Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106221301350.23405(a)britney.spears.net>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Hello Fons!
It's good to hear, that people are more often fooled by spectral
analysers
than their own ears. I suppose I'll just continue the way I have and
if I'm
just curious I will use songanalysis and have some fun. :-)
Thanks for clarifying and putting me at ease. I hope Massy is more
at ease
as well. You so often hear about graphic displays of waveforms,
analysis with
graphs and what not and think, that it's one of the important tools to
get
professional mixes, especially if you think about "radio
compatibility" and
"pop standards".
Warm regards
Julien
You might be able to see low band frequencies inaudible by your
speakers, that could stress other speakers. A little bit far-fetched,
but I could imagine that someone might use it for this or similar
issues. I don't know anybody using spectral analysis for the mastering.