13 Feb
2010
13 Feb
'10
12:48 p.m.
Jeremy wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
"Art that does not communicate is not art. It's just a spot on the
wall." - To paraphrase something my artist daughter said in response to
a famous modern painting we saw at Pompidou Center in Paris.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
Jeremy wrote:
Hello Erik,
Thanks for your reply, that's a question to which I can reply sensibly.
I'm have to take care thought that I'm not mixing things up. Art,
talent, craftsmanship, skills...
I just don't like what he's doing, that's right. And that's what I used
as my standing ground. Not good. But it provoked a good discussion, so
it wasn't in vain.
Personally for me art is something that spawned from a creative process,
that is a display of someone's talent and that has an original approach. Esben Stien wrote:
Maybe you could flesh out your argument that "it's not art". Jeremy <jeremy(a)autostatic.com> writes:
> The guy is very good at doing his thing but it's no art and you don't
> need to be talented to do such a thing.
What a load of crap;).
Hello Esben,
Maybe you could argument that a bit more? Why is my opinion "a load of
crap"?