22 Jan
2007
22 Jan
'07
10:58 a.m.
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote:
I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi or
anything is
pretty pointless, right?
actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the
wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have them
at all.
lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree. perhaps i
can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have...
if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i can
perhaps explain a little.
--
Leonard Ritter
-- Freelance Art & Logic
-- http://www.leonard-ritter.com